problem of geometric operator in v8.2.1

Started by Ioseph Kimalmost 19 years ago5 messages
#1Ioseph Kim
pgsql-kr@postgresql.or.kr

=> select @-@ lseg '((0,0),(1,0))';
?column?
----------
1
(1 row)

=> select @-@ path '((0,0),(1,0))';
?column?
----------
2
(1 row)

----------

It's maybe bug in v8.2.1

#2Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: Ioseph Kim (#1)
Re: problem of geometric operator in v8.2.1

"Ioseph Kim" <pgsql-kr@postgresql.or.kr> writes:

=> select @-@ lseg '((0,0),(1,0))';
?column?
----------
1
(1 row)

=> select @-@ path '((0,0),(1,0))';
?column?
----------
2
(1 row)

It's maybe bug in v8.2.1

What do you think is wrong with those answers?

regards, tom lane

#3Ioseph Kim
pgsql-kr@postgresql.or.kr
In reply to: Ioseph Kim (#1)
Re: problem of geometric operator in v8.2.1

when @-@ operator used at path type,
below query maybe returns 1.
because this path is just line.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "Ioseph Kim" <pgsql-kr@postgresql.or.kr>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 5:36 AM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] problem of geometric operator in v8.2.1

Show quoted text

"Ioseph Kim" <pgsql-kr@postgresql.or.kr> writes:

=> select @-@ lseg '((0,0),(1,0))';
?column?
----------
1
(1 row)

=> select @-@ path '((0,0),(1,0))';
?column?
----------
2
(1 row)

It's maybe bug in v8.2.1

What do you think is wrong with those answers?

regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

#4Ioseph Kim
pgsql-kr@postgresql.or.kr
In reply to: Ioseph Kim (#1)
Re: problem of geometric operator in v8.2.1

I misunderstood. :)

path '((0,0),(1,0))' is 'closed' path.

in this case, it's maybe operator calculated return length too.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ioseph Kim" <pgsql-kr@postgresql.or.kr>
To: <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 6:00 AM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] problem of geometric operator in v8.2.1

Show quoted text

when @-@ operator used at path type,
below query maybe returns 1.
because this path is just line.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "Ioseph Kim" <pgsql-kr@postgresql.or.kr>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 5:36 AM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] problem of geometric operator in v8.2.1

"Ioseph Kim" <pgsql-kr@postgresql.or.kr> writes:

=> select @-@ lseg '((0,0),(1,0))';
?column?
----------
1
(1 row)

=> select @-@ path '((0,0),(1,0))';
?column?
----------
2
(1 row)

It's maybe bug in v8.2.1

What do you think is wrong with those answers?

regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

#5Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: Ioseph Kim (#3)
Re: problem of geometric operator in v8.2.1

"Ioseph Kim" <pgsql-kr@postgresql.or.kr> writes:

when @-@ operator used at path type,
below query maybe returns 1.
because this path is just line.

No, because it's a closed path, so it's a loop from (0,0) to (1,0)
and back again. If you don't want to count the return segment,
use an open path.

regards, tom lane