CVS trees and post-6.4 release issues
We will not be splitting the CVS tree after the 6.4 release.
We will continue with one source tree, applying patches needed for any
6.4.* minor releases.
When we have finished with 6.4.* releases, we will mark the cvs tree,
and start on 6.5. We mark it so we can supply patches to fix serious
problems that appear after 6.4.* has been closed.
Any risky feature patches that are posted during this period will be
held, and applied once 6.4.* is finished. We expect the 6.4.* feature
freeze period to last about one month.
Certain _safe_ feature patches will be applied during this period.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
On Fri, 30 Oct 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
We will not be splitting the CVS tree after the 6.4 release.
Actually, the 'splitting' and 'tagging' are one and the same, and
it will be tagged the moment I roll the release tar ball...that is
automatic *shrug* Its been done for every past release...if you don't use
the branch, not a problem, but it is created...
We will continue with one source tree, applying patches needed for any
6.4.* minor releases.When we have finished with 6.4.* releases, we will mark the cvs tree,
and start on 6.5. We mark it so we can supply patches to fix serious
problems that appear after 6.4.* has been closed.Any risky feature patches that are posted during this period will be
held, and applied once 6.4.* is finished. We expect the 6.4.* feature
freeze period to last about one month.Certain _safe_ feature patches will be applied during this period.
I don't think so...I heard that one after the BETA freeze, and
look at the mess *that* created. If there is a feature freeze for
post-release bugs to be fixed, features are *frozen*, period, end of
story, do not pass go, do not collect $200, end of story...
Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
On Fri, 30 Oct 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
We will not be splitting the CVS tree after the 6.4 release.
Actually, the 'splitting' and 'tagging' are one and the same, and
it will be tagged the moment I roll the release tar ball...that is
automatic *shrug* Its been done for every past release...if you don't use
the branch, not a problem, but it is created...
Yes.
We will continue with one source tree, applying patches needed for any
6.4.* minor releases.When we have finished with 6.4.* releases, we will mark the cvs tree,
and start on 6.5. We mark it so we can supply patches to fix serious
problems that appear after 6.4.* has been closed.Any risky feature patches that are posted during this period will be
held, and applied once 6.4.* is finished. We expect the 6.4.* feature
freeze period to last about one month.Certain _safe_ feature patches will be applied during this period.
I don't think so...I heard that one after the BETA freeze, and
look at the mess *that* created. If there is a feature freeze for
post-release bugs to be fixed, features are *frozen*, period, end of
story, do not pass go, do not collect $200, end of story...
The only feature item I think we considered adding was Jan's LIMIT. Do
you want that? Let us know.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
On Fri, 30 Oct 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
The only feature item I think we considered adding was Jan's LIMIT. Do
you want that? Let us know.
If you can personally guarantee that it will in absolutely no way
cause *any* problems with the system on any platform...go for it *grin*
The feature freeze is meant to allow us to cover over any
operating system related tweaks...adding in a new feature opens the door
for new problems to creep in...
Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org