pgsql: Fix typo

Started by Peter Eisentrautover 13 years ago4 messagescomitters
Jump to latest
#1Peter Eisentraut
peter_e@gmx.net

Fix typo

Branch
------
master

Details
-------
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/4bb106ef4f6924312a67768571292c6f247122de

Modified Files
--------------
doc/src/sgml/client-auth.sgml | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

#2Magnus Hagander
magnus@hagander.net
In reply to: Peter Eisentraut (#1)
Re: pgsql: Fix typo

On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 3:58 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:

Fix typo

Branch
------
master

Details
-------

http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/4bb106ef4f6924312a67768571292c6f247122de

Modified Files
--------------
doc/src/sgml/client-auth.sgml | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

Any particular reason not to back patch? Looks like a bugfix to me...

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

#3Peter Eisentraut
peter_e@gmx.net
In reply to: Magnus Hagander (#2)
Re: pgsql: Fix typo

On 11/2/12 6:19 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:

On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 3:58 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net
<mailto:peter_e@gmx.net>> wrote:

Fix typo

Branch
------
master

Details
-------
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/4bb106ef4f6924312a67768571292c6f247122de

Modified Files
--------------
doc/src/sgml/client-auth.sgml | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

Any particular reason not to back patch? Looks like a bugfix to me...

The issue does not exist in the back branches.

#4Magnus Hagander
magnus@hagander.net
In reply to: Peter Eisentraut (#3)
Re: pgsql: Fix typo

On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:

On 11/2/12 6:19 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:

On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 3:58 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net
<mailto:peter_e@gmx.net>> wrote:

Fix typo

Branch
------
master

Details
-------

http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/4bb106ef4f6924312a67768571292c6f247122de

Modified Files
--------------
doc/src/sgml/client-auth.sgml | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

Any particular reason not to back patch? Looks like a bugfix to me...

The issue does not exist in the back branches.

D'oh. I got my git repo confused. It was on multiple branches, yes, but
they were all local in my repo. :)

Sorry!

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/