Tidied up patch status page

Greg Smith wrote:

I'm not sure what order the patches at at
http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Todo:PatchStatus were listed
in before, but it seemed to me they'd be a whole lot more useful sorted
by the remaining actions on them--so that's what I did.

well the original order was basically arbitrary(basically the order I
copied it over from my notes) - alvaro already resorted it once though ...
It's actually a pity that we are not running a more recent version of
mediawiki because newer versions do have things like sortable tables and
other improvments that might be of help.

Stefan

Greg Smith wrote:

I'm not sure what order the patches at at
http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Todo:PatchStatus were listed in
before, but it seemed to me they'd be a whole lot more useful sorted by
the remaining actions on them--so that's what I did.

Yep, much better. I think we didn't reorder it in the past to avoid
HTML churn but in the future I will try to keep that ordering.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com> writes:

I'm not sure what order the patches at at
http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Todo:PatchStatus were listed in
before, but it seemed to me they'd be a whole lot more useful sorted by
the remaining actions on them--so that's what I did.

I think you lost at least one patch in this change, viz
"Maintaining cluster order on insert"

regards, tom lane

On Sat, 7 Jul 2007, Tom Lane wrote:

I think you lost at least one patch in this change, viz
"Maintaining cluster order on insert"

It's back. I double-checked: 40 patches before, 40 now. I thought that
I was safe editing this bugger at 5am, but Stefan was watching; I think I
lost that one as part of the merge conflict confusion from the edit he did
before I was finished proofreading.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD