test

Started by Joshua D. Drakeover 18 years ago4 messageshackers
Jump to latest
#1Joshua D. Drake
jd@commandprompt.com

test

#2Alvaro Herrera
alvherre@2ndquadrant.com
In reply to: Joshua D. Drake (#1)
Re: test

Joshua D. Drake wrote:

test

Does anybody see any value in having hackers@postgresql.org be an alias
for pgsql-hackers?

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.flickr.com/photos/alvherre/
"Postgres is bloatware by design: it was built to house
PhD theses." (Joey Hellerstein, SIGMOD annual conference 2002)

#3Andrew Hammond
andrew.george.hammond@gmail.com
In reply to: Alvaro Herrera (#2)
Re: test

On Dec 12, 2007 11:37 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:

Joshua D. Drake wrote:

test

Does anybody see any value in having hackers@postgresql.org be an alias
for pgsql-hackers?

No, but I see some mild irritation in having to modify my rules to tag a
second address with the pgsql-hackers label.

Andrew

#4Bruce Momjian
bruce@momjian.us
In reply to: Andrew Hammond (#3)
Re: test

Andrew Hammond wrote:

On Dec 12, 2007 11:37 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:

Joshua D. Drake wrote:

test

Does anybody see any value in having hackers@postgresql.org be an alias
for pgsql-hackers?

No, but I see some mild irritation in having to modify my rules to tag a
second address with the pgsql-hackers label.

The bigger problem is that if the header address isn't modified while
being renamed, and someone then adds the right address, you now have
emails going to both addresses.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +