What happened to pl/proxy and FDW?

Josh Berkus wrote:

I thought the idea was that we were going to add PL/proxy to 8.5, with
support for the foriegn data wrapper syntax? What happened to that?

Using SQL/MED for defining pl/proxy clusters is still in the TODO list.
I hope to do something about it during the next few weeks. However, I
doubt if adding SQL/MED support would be enough for including it in 8.5
contrib.

regards,
Martin

Martin Pihlak escribió:

Josh Berkus wrote:

I thought the idea was that we were going to add PL/proxy to 8.5, with
support for the foriegn data wrapper syntax? What happened to that?

Using SQL/MED for defining pl/proxy clusters is still in the TODO list.
I hope to do something about it during the next few weeks. However, I
doubt if adding SQL/MED support would be enough for including it in 8.5
contrib.

regards,
Martin

I have two question about SQL/MED, It not enough to include this on the
core?
Peter doesn´t work on it ?
Which is the development state of SQL/MED?
Regards

--
-------------------------------------
"TIP 4: No hagas 'kill -9' a postmaster"
Ing. Marcos Luís Ortíz Valmaseda
PostgreSQL System DBA
Centro de Tecnologías de Almacenamiento y Análisis de Datos (CENTALAD)(centalad@uci.cu)
Universidad de las Ciencias Informáticas(http://www.uci.cu)
La Habana, Cuba

Linux User # 418229
http://www.postgresql-es.org
http://www.postgresql.org
http://www.planetpostgresql.org
http://www.freebsd.org/es

On ons, 2009-12-09 at 08:56 -0500, Ing. Marcos Ortiz Valmaseda wrote:

Which is the development state of SQL/MED?

That depends on what features of SQL/MED you are interested in. As you
could read upthread, PL/Proxy support is being worked on. Dblink
supports it in 8.4. The next step might be foreign table support. I
recall that there was a patch proposed for that a couple of commitfests
ago, but that did not go further.