getting to beta

Started by Robert Haasalmost 16 years ago5 messages
#1Robert Haas
robertmhaas@gmail.com

Now that PostgreSQL 9.0 alpha4 is bundled (though apparently not quite
out the door yet), it seems like a good time to think about what we'll
need to do to get to beta. Any thoughts?

http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_8.5_Open_Items currently
lists no open items, and the Hot Standby TODO page to which it links
also lists no critical open items. The Streaming Replication TODO to
which it links lists a LOT of open items.

My suspicion is that the real situation is more complicated than the
above picture.

...Robert

#2Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: Robert Haas (#1)
Re: getting to beta

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:

http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_8.5_Open_Items currently
lists no open items,

um ... are we looking at the same page? I see 8 open items there,
not counting the links to the separate HS and SR pages.

My suspicion is that the real situation is more complicated than the
above picture.

I believe Bruce is in process of going through his mailbox to find stuff
that slipped through the cracks. That will probably result in a longer
list...

regards, tom lane

PS: can we rename that page to "9.0 open items"?

#3Bruce Momjian
bruce@momjian.us
In reply to: Tom Lane (#2)
Re: getting to beta

Tom Lane wrote:

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:

http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_8.5_Open_Items currently
lists no open items,

um ... are we looking at the same page? I see 8 open items there,
not counting the links to the separate HS and SR pages.

My suspicion is that the real situation is more complicated than the
above picture.

I believe Bruce is in process of going through his mailbox to find stuff
that slipped through the cracks. That will probably result in a longer
list...

I am. I am trying to close as many as I can, and sending emails about
the rest.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com
  PG East:  http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do
  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
#4Robert Haas
robertmhaas@gmail.com
In reply to: Tom Lane (#2)
Re: getting to beta

On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:

http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_8.5_Open_Items currently
lists no open items,

um ... are we looking at the same page?  I see 8 open items there,
not counting the links to the separate HS and SR pages.

I'm sorry, I left a word out: I meant to say that it lists no *major*
open items. There are certainly some things listed there, but nothing
to get excited about, at least not AFAICS.

My suspicion is that the real situation is more complicated than the
above picture.

I believe Bruce is in process of going through his mailbox to find stuff
that slipped through the cracks.  That will probably result in a longer
list...

                       regards, tom lane

PS: can we rename that page to "9.0 open items"?

I leave that to someone with superior wiki-fu.

...Robert

#5Stefan Kaltenbrunner
stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc
In reply to: Robert Haas (#4)
Re: getting to beta

Robert Haas wrote:

On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:

http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_8.5_Open_Items currently
lists no open items,

um ... are we looking at the same page? I see 8 open items there,
not counting the links to the separate HS and SR pages.

I'm sorry, I left a word out: I meant to say that it lists no *major*
open items. There are certainly some things listed there, but nothing
to get excited about, at least not AFAICS.

My suspicion is that the real situation is more complicated than the
above picture.

I believe Bruce is in process of going through his mailbox to find stuff
that slipped through the cracks. That will probably result in a longer
list...

regards, tom lane

PS: can we rename that page to "9.0 open items"?

I leave that to someone with superior wiki-fu.

done

Stefan