system catalogs page

Started by Robert Haasover 15 years ago3 messages
#1Robert Haas
robertmhaas@gmail.com

I was just noticing that, on this page here:

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/catalogs.html

...all of the catalogs are in alphabetical order, except for
pg_db_role_setting, which is filed in the place in alphabetical order
where it would belong if the name were spelled pg_setting.

Is there any reason I shouldn't go fix this?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

#2Thom Brown
thom@linux.com
In reply to: Robert Haas (#1)
Re: system catalogs page

On 17 September 2010 18:17, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:

I was just noticing that, on this page here:

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/catalogs.html

...all of the catalogs are in alphabetical order, except for
pg_db_role_setting, which is filed in the place in alphabetical order
where it would belong if the name were spelled pg_setting.

or pg_role_setting

Is there any reason I shouldn't go fix this?

Looks wrong to me, so I'd say should be fixed.

--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935

#3Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: Robert Haas (#1)
Re: system catalogs page

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:

I was just noticing that, on this page here:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/catalogs.html

...all of the catalogs are in alphabetical order, except for
pg_db_role_setting, which is filed in the place in alphabetical order
where it would belong if the name were spelled pg_setting.

Is there any reason I shouldn't go fix this?

Sounds like a mistake to me ...

regards, tom lane