system catalogs page
I was just noticing that, on this page here:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/catalogs.html
...all of the catalogs are in alphabetical order, except for
pg_db_role_setting, which is filed in the place in alphabetical order
where it would belong if the name were spelled pg_setting.
Is there any reason I shouldn't go fix this?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
On 17 September 2010 18:17, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
I was just noticing that, on this page here:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/catalogs.html
...all of the catalogs are in alphabetical order, except for
pg_db_role_setting, which is filed in the place in alphabetical order
where it would belong if the name were spelled pg_setting.
or pg_role_setting
Is there any reason I shouldn't go fix this?
Looks wrong to me, so I'd say should be fixed.
--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
I was just noticing that, on this page here:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/catalogs.html
...all of the catalogs are in alphabetical order, except for
pg_db_role_setting, which is filed in the place in alphabetical order
where it would belong if the name were spelled pg_setting.
Is there any reason I shouldn't go fix this?
Sounds like a mistake to me ...
regards, tom lane