Docs on BOOTSTRAP relations

Started by Rod Taylorover 24 years ago5 messagespatches
Jump to latest
#1Rod Taylor
rbt@rbt.ca

Cleaned up the README somewhat. Removed a useless statement which was
even marked as outdated (if someone really wants the old one, have
them dig through CVS).

Also added a note that in order for a BOOTSTRAP table to be created,
it is required to have data in it. You wouldn't believe the number of
other changes I made before that one. Fiddled with OID ranges, order
of the creation among other things.

Also made a note of the order of the header files in the
POSTGRES_BKI_SRCS line.

--
Rod Taylor

Your eyes are weary from staring at the CRT. You feel sleepy. Notice
how restful it is to watch the cursor blink. Close your eyes. The
opinions stated above are yours. You cannot imagine why you ever felt
otherwise.

Attachments:

README.patchapplication/octet-stream; name=README.patchDownload+24-24
#2Rod Taylor
rbt@rbt.ca
In reply to: Rod Taylor (#1)
Re: Docs on BOOTSTRAP relations

Hmm.. ignore this patch. It just doesn't sound right. Something else
has to be going on...

--
Rod Taylor

This message represents the official view of the voices in my head

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rod Taylor" <rbt@zort.ca>
To: <pgsql-patches@postgresql.org>
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 9:15 PM
Subject: [PATCHES] Docs on BOOTSTRAP relations

Cleaned up the README somewhat. Removed a useless statement which

was

even marked as outdated (if someone really wants the old one, have
them dig through CVS).

Also added a note that in order for a BOOTSTRAP table to be created,
it is required to have data in it. You wouldn't believe the number

of

other changes I made before that one. Fiddled with OID ranges,

order

of the creation among other things.

Also made a note of the order of the header files in the
POSTGRES_BKI_SRCS line.

--
Rod Taylor

Your eyes are weary from staring at the CRT. You feel sleepy. Notice
how restful it is to watch the cursor blink. Close your eyes. The
opinions stated above are yours. You cannot imagine why you ever

felt

otherwise.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------

---------------------------(end of

broadcast)---------------------------

Show quoted text

TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

#3Rod Taylor
rbt@rbt.ca
In reply to: Rod Taylor (#1)
Re: Docs on BOOTSTRAP relations

This one better describes the problem.

heap.c needs to be updated to include 'Hard coded badness' for that
table.
--
Rod Taylor

This message represents the official view of the voices in my head

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rod Taylor" <rbt@zort.ca>
To: <pgsql-patches@postgresql.org>
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 9:38 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Docs on BOOTSTRAP relations

Hmm.. ignore this patch. It just doesn't sound right. Something

else

has to be going on...

--
Rod Taylor

This message represents the official view of the voices in my head

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rod Taylor" <rbt@zort.ca>
To: <pgsql-patches@postgresql.org>
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 9:15 PM
Subject: [PATCHES] Docs on BOOTSTRAP relations

Cleaned up the README somewhat. Removed a useless statement which

was

even marked as outdated (if someone really wants the old one, have
them dig through CVS).

Also added a note that in order for a BOOTSTRAP table to be

created,

it is required to have data in it. You wouldn't believe the

number

of

other changes I made before that one. Fiddled with OID ranges,

order

of the creation among other things.

Also made a note of the order of the header files in the
POSTGRES_BKI_SRCS line.

--
Rod Taylor

Your eyes are weary from staring at the CRT. You feel sleepy.

Notice

how restful it is to watch the cursor blink. Close your eyes. The
opinions stated above are yours. You cannot imagine why you ever

felt

otherwise.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

--

----------

---------------------------(end of

broadcast)---------------------------

TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

---------------------------(end of

broadcast)---------------------------

Show quoted text

TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Attachments:

README.patchapplication/octet-stream; name=README.patchDownload+24-24
#4Bruce Momjian
bruce@momjian.us
In reply to: Rod Taylor (#3)
Re: Docs on BOOTSTRAP relations

Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:

http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches

I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rod Taylor wrote:

This one better describes the problem.

heap.c needs to be updated to include 'Hard coded badness' for that
table.
--
Rod Taylor

This message represents the official view of the voices in my head

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rod Taylor" <rbt@zort.ca>
To: <pgsql-patches@postgresql.org>
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 9:38 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Docs on BOOTSTRAP relations

Hmm.. ignore this patch. It just doesn't sound right. Something

else

has to be going on...

--
Rod Taylor

This message represents the official view of the voices in my head

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rod Taylor" <rbt@zort.ca>
To: <pgsql-patches@postgresql.org>
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 9:15 PM
Subject: [PATCHES] Docs on BOOTSTRAP relations

Cleaned up the README somewhat. Removed a useless statement which

was

even marked as outdated (if someone really wants the old one, have
them dig through CVS).

Also added a note that in order for a BOOTSTRAP table to be

created,

it is required to have data in it. You wouldn't believe the

number

of

other changes I made before that one. Fiddled with OID ranges,

order

of the creation among other things.

Also made a note of the order of the header files in the
POSTGRES_BKI_SRCS line.

--
Rod Taylor

Your eyes are weary from staring at the CRT. You feel sleepy.

Notice

how restful it is to watch the cursor blink. Close your eyes. The
opinions stated above are yours. You cannot imagine why you ever

felt

otherwise.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

--

----------

---------------------------(end of

broadcast)---------------------------

TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

---------------------------(end of

broadcast)---------------------------

TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
#5Bruce Momjian
bruce@momjian.us
In reply to: Rod Taylor (#3)
Re: Docs on BOOTSTRAP relations

Patch applied. Thanks.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rod Taylor wrote:

This one better describes the problem.

heap.c needs to be updated to include 'Hard coded badness' for that
table.
--
Rod Taylor

This message represents the official view of the voices in my head

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rod Taylor" <rbt@zort.ca>
To: <pgsql-patches@postgresql.org>
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 9:38 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Docs on BOOTSTRAP relations

Hmm.. ignore this patch. It just doesn't sound right. Something

else

has to be going on...

--
Rod Taylor

This message represents the official view of the voices in my head

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rod Taylor" <rbt@zort.ca>
To: <pgsql-patches@postgresql.org>
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 9:15 PM
Subject: [PATCHES] Docs on BOOTSTRAP relations

Cleaned up the README somewhat. Removed a useless statement which

was

even marked as outdated (if someone really wants the old one, have
them dig through CVS).

Also added a note that in order for a BOOTSTRAP table to be

created,

it is required to have data in it. You wouldn't believe the

number

of

other changes I made before that one. Fiddled with OID ranges,

order

of the creation among other things.

Also made a note of the order of the header files in the
POSTGRES_BKI_SRCS line.

--
Rod Taylor

Your eyes are weary from staring at the CRT. You feel sleepy.

Notice

how restful it is to watch the cursor blink. Close your eyes. The
opinions stated above are yours. You cannot imagine why you ever

felt

otherwise.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

--

----------

---------------------------(end of

broadcast)---------------------------

TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

---------------------------(end of

broadcast)---------------------------

TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026