ODBC Patch to prevent setting of KSQO on 7.3+ servers

Great. Also, we disabled KSQO in 7.1 so you should check for 7.1, not
7.3.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dave Page wrote:

Subject says it all...

BTW: Hiroshi, did you get a change to review my UI patch yet?

Regards, Dave.

Content-Description: odbc-ksqo.patch

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Ack! Of course you did - it just still accepted the setting until the
other day!

Update attached...

Regards, Dave.

"Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> writes:

Subject says it all...

Actually, you might as well suppress sending "set ksqo" in all
PG versions >= 7.1. It's been dead code since then...

regards, tom lane

Updated patch already submitted :-)

Regards, Dave.

Dave Page wrote:

Ack! Of course you did - it just still accepted the setting until the
other day!

Update attached...

OK, where's the patch?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Dave Page wrote:

Subject says it all...

OK. I would apply it after checking it.

BTW: Hiroshi, did you get a change to review my UI patch yet?

Not so much, sorry.
You edited it using a resource editor ?
#ifdef MULTIBYTE stuff etc seems to be removed.
I've had no time to think how to manage it.

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
http://w2422.nsk.ne.jp/~inoue/

-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@candle.pha.pa.us]
Sent: 23 June 2002 00:35
To: Dave Page
Cc: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org; pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [ODBC] ODBC Patch to prevent setting of KSQO on
7.3+ servers

Dave Page wrote:

Ack! Of course you did - it just still accepted the setting

until the

other day!

Update attached...

OK, where's the patch?

Sorry, attached this time.

Regards, Dave.

-----Original Message-----
From: Hiroshi Inoue [mailto:Inoue@tpf.co.jp]
Sent: 24 June 2002 06:11
To: Dave Page
Cc: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org; pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [ODBC] ODBC Patch to prevent setting of KSQO on
7.3+ servers

Dave Page wrote:

Subject says it all...

OK. I would apply it after checking it.

BTW: Hiroshi, did you get a change to review my UI patch yet?

Not so much, sorry.
You edited it using a resource editor ?
#ifdef MULTIBYTE stuff etc seems to be removed.
I've had no time to think how to manage it.

Hmm, yes, I used either the Visual Studio 6 or Visual Studio.NET editor
(I forget which) - and it took a fair while even that way. I didn't
realise there was any #ifdef MULTIBYTE stuff in there & figured that VS
was OK considering the header in the file:

//Microsoft Developer Studio generated resource script.

I can either figure out the differences and manually sort it, or we
could get rid of the non-multibyte version (we don't ship it anymore
anyway, as we agreed some time ago).

Which do you prefer?

Regards, Dave.

Dave Page wrote:

BTW: Hiroshi, did you get a change to review my UI patch yet?

Not so much, sorry.
You edited it using a resource editor ?
#ifdef MULTIBYTE stuff etc seems to be removed.
I've had no time to think how to manage it.

Hmm, yes, I used either the Visual Studio 6 or Visual Studio.NET editor
(I forget which) - and it took a fair while even that way. I didn't
realise there was any #ifdef MULTIBYTE stuff in there & figured that VS
was OK considering the header in the file:

//Microsoft Developer Studio generated resource script.

I can either figure out the differences and manually sort it, or we
could get rid of the non-multibyte version (we don't ship it anymore
anyway, as we agreed some time ago).

Which do you prefer?

Sorry for the late answer.
According to Eiji Tokuya, we had better adopt the
multibyte version of resource if we would only ship
with the multibyte version of driver.

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
http://w2422.nsk.ne.jp/~inoue/