swedish pg_controldata
Here is a swedish translation for pg_controldata.
Remember to add sv to nls.mk
I never know what version number I should put in to the translation. Now I
put in "Project-Id-Version: PostgreSQL 7.2.2", but that is not true, and
7.3 would not be true either. If someone have a comment about that, please
tell me.
I have also added a small patch for some strings that where not marked in
pg_controldata. I have not added these to the sv.po file.
I think strings like "IN_PRODUCTION" should also be changed in english. I
would rather have "IN PRODUCTION" or "In production". These strings are
only for displaying to the user, they don't have to match the #defines in
the program (like DB_IN_PRODUCTION).
ps. I assume that the warning of bad CRC I get when I run pg_control is
because I have an old database (7.2.1) and this is the cvs version.
--
/Dennis
Dennis Bjᅵrklund writes:
Here is a swedish translation for pg_controldata.
Remember to add sv to nls.mk
Will do.
I never know what version number I should put in to the translation. Now I
put in "Project-Id-Version: PostgreSQL 7.2.2", but that is not true, and
7.3 would not be true either. If someone have a comment about that, please
tell me.
The authorative answer is that it doesn't matter. The field is there, so
it's reasonable to fill it with something. I suggest that we stick to the
major version of the branch you're working on, so it'd be 7.3 right now
and for the rest of the 7.3.* series.
I have also added a small patch for some strings that where not marked in
pg_controldata. I have not added these to the sv.po file.I think strings like "IN_PRODUCTION" should also be changed in english. I
would rather have "IN PRODUCTION" or "In production". These strings are
only for displaying to the user, they don't have to match the #defines in
the program (like DB_IN_PRODUCTION).
These strings reflect the internal symbols of the values in the respective
field, which, I would say, is an artifact of the original hackish nature
of pg_controldata. But now that it's an official tool we should change
them to something human readable, as you suggest.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net