Runtime.SGML diff ... please expedite!

Started by Josh Berkusabout 23 years ago22 messagespatches
Jump to latest
#1Josh Berkus
josh@agliodbs.com

Bruce,

Attached is the fully corrected version of the re-ording patch for
Runtime.sgml and dependant files.

Can you please expedite applying this? Since it involves a grand re-ordering
of the file, any successive changes to runtime.sgml need to be merged by
hand.

To see what I'm getting at, the first draft (NOT the final version) of the
HTML version of the file is up at:
http://www.agliodbs.com/runtime/index.html

Thanks!

--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

Attachments:

runtime.sgml.difftext/x-diff; charset=us-ascii; name=runtime.sgml.diffDownload+2192-1862
#2Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: Josh Berkus (#1)
Re: Runtime.SGML diff ... please expedite!

Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:

Attached is the fully corrected version of the re-ording patch for=20
Runtime.sgml and dependant files.

Dependent files? I only see a diff for runtime.sgml there ...

regards, tom lane

#3Rod Taylor
rbt@rbt.ca
In reply to: Tom Lane (#2)
Re: Runtime.SGML diff ... please expedite!

This is the other portion he is referring to.

client-auth.sgml references a renamed ID in runtime.sgml

On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 16:46, Tom Lane wrote:

Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:

Attached is the fully corrected version of the re-ording patch for=20
Runtime.sgml and dependant files.

Dependent files? I only see a diff for runtime.sgml there ...

regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match

--
Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>

PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc

Attachments:

difftext/x-patch; charset=iso-8859-1; name=diffDownload+2-2
#4Bruce Momjian
bruce@momjian.us
In reply to: Josh Berkus (#1)
Re: Runtime.SGML diff ... please expedite!

Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:

http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches

I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Josh Berkus wrote:

Bruce,

Attached is the fully corrected version of the re-ording patch for
Runtime.sgml and dependant files.

Can you please expedite applying this? Since it involves a grand re-ordering
of the file, any successive changes to runtime.sgml need to be merged by
hand.

To see what I'm getting at, the first draft (NOT the final version) of the
HTML version of the file is up at:
http://www.agliodbs.com/runtime/index.html

Thanks!

--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
#5Bruce Momjian
bruce@momjian.us
In reply to: Rod Taylor (#3)
Re: Runtime.SGML diff ... please expedite!

Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:

http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches

I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rod Taylor wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.

This is the other portion he is referring to.

client-auth.sgml references a renamed ID in runtime.sgml

On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 16:46, Tom Lane wrote:

Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:

Attached is the fully corrected version of the re-ording patch for=20
Runtime.sgml and dependant files.

Dependent files? I only see a diff for runtime.sgml there ...

regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match

--
Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>

PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc

[ Attachment, skipping... ]
-- End of PGP section, PGP failed!

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
#6Bruce Momjian
bruce@momjian.us
In reply to: Josh Berkus (#1)
Re: Runtime.SGML diff ... please expedite!

Patch applied. Thanks.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Josh Berkus wrote:

Bruce,

Attached is the fully corrected version of the re-ording patch for
Runtime.sgml and dependant files.

Can you please expedite applying this? Since it involves a grand re-ordering
of the file, any successive changes to runtime.sgml need to be merged by
hand.

To see what I'm getting at, the first draft (NOT the final version) of the
HTML version of the file is up at:
http://www.agliodbs.com/runtime/index.html

Thanks!

--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
#7Bruce Momjian
bruce@momjian.us
In reply to: Rod Taylor (#3)
Re: Runtime.SGML diff ... please expedite!

Patch applied. Thanks.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rod Taylor wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.

This is the other portion he is referring to.

client-auth.sgml references a renamed ID in runtime.sgml

On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 16:46, Tom Lane wrote:

Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:

Attached is the fully corrected version of the re-ording patch for=20
Runtime.sgml and dependant files.

Dependent files? I only see a diff for runtime.sgml there ...

regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match

--
Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>

PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc

[ Attachment, skipping... ]
-- End of PGP section, PGP failed!

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
#8Josh Berkus
josh@agliodbs.com
In reply to: Bruce Momjian (#6)
Re: Runtime.SGML diff ... please expedite!

Bruce,

Patch applied. Thanks.

Great. 'cause I need to patch the patch, due to a cut-and-paste error. Next
patch coming Friday, much less extensive than this one.

Is the HAS_RENDEZVOUS GUC still coming? Is there docs for it?

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

#9Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: Josh Berkus (#8)
Re: Runtime.SGML diff ... please expedite!

Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:

Is the HAS_RENDEZVOUS GUC still coming? Is there docs for it?

Don't worry about it. If it gets added, it will be the adder's
responsibility to update the docs too.

(But if you are not happy with the current state of runtime.sgml,
we need fixes for that ASAP.)

regards, tom lane

#10Josh Berkus
josh@agliodbs.com
In reply to: Tom Lane (#9)
Re: Runtime.SGML diff ... please expedite!

Tom,

(But if you are not happy with the current state of runtime.sgml,
we need fixes for that ASAP.)

I just yesterday realized that the STATISTICS section could be profitably
folded into LOGGING and QUERY TUNING. I will send a second patch tommorrow
if possible.

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

#11Bruce Momjian
bruce@momjian.us
In reply to: Josh Berkus (#8)
Re: Runtime.SGML diff ... please expedite!

Josh Berkus wrote:

Bruce,

Patch applied. Thanks.

Great. 'cause I need to patch the patch, due to a cut-and-paste error. Next
patch coming Friday, much less extensive than this one.

Is the HAS_RENDEZVOUS GUC still coming? Is there docs for it?

I haven't gotten to it --- it may have to wait for 7.5.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
#12Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: Bruce Momjian (#11)
Re: Runtime.SGML diff ... please expedite!

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:

Is the HAS_RENDEZVOUS GUC still coming? Is there docs for it?

I haven't gotten to it --- it may have to wait for 7.5.

It should be removed from runtime.sgml then.

Also, one of the Red Hat guys pointed out to me that
SHOW_BTREE_BUILD_STATS seems to have crept back into runtime.sgml,
although it was removed during 7.4 development. Could we have that
out of there in the next patch?

regards, tom lane

#13Bruce Momjian
bruce@momjian.us
In reply to: Tom Lane (#12)
Re: Runtime.SGML diff ... please expedite!

Tom Lane wrote:

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:

Is the HAS_RENDEZVOUS GUC still coming? Is there docs for it?

I haven't gotten to it --- it may have to wait for 7.5.

It should be removed from runtime.sgml then.

Also, one of the Red Hat guys pointed out to me that
SHOW_BTREE_BUILD_STATS seems to have crept back into runtime.sgml,
although it was removed during 7.4 development. Could we have that
out of there in the next patch?

Not sure why Rendezvous is in runtime.sgml now --- it is needed only if
you are doing two postmaster, and I will either do it for 7.4 or add it
to TODO.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
#14Josh Berkus
josh@agliodbs.com
In reply to: Tom Lane (#12)
Re: Runtime.SGML diff ... please expedite!

Tom,

It should be removed from runtime.sgml then.

Also, one of the Red Hat guys pointed out to me that
SHOW_BTREE_BUILD_STATS seems to have crept back into runtime.sgml,
although it was removed during 7.4 development. Could we have that
out of there in the next patch?

Will do. Is SHOW_BTREE gone, or is it just a "Source Developer Option"?

--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

#15Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: Josh Berkus (#14)
Re: Runtime.SGML diff ... please expedite!

Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:

Also, one of the Red Hat guys pointed out to me that
SHOW_BTREE_BUILD_STATS seems to have crept back into runtime.sgml,
although it was removed during 7.4 development. Could we have that
out of there in the next patch?

Will do. Is SHOW_BTREE gone, or is it just a "Source Developer Option"?

It's gone. You might want to crosscheck the docs against the CVS-tip
version of guc.c ...

regards, tom lane

#16Josh Berkus
josh@agliodbs.com
In reply to: Tom Lane (#15)
Re: Runtime.SGML diff ... please expedite!

Tom,

It's gone. You might want to crosscheck the docs against the CVS-tip
version of guc.c ...

Well, I did 2 weeks ago when I started this process. I'll do it again before
beta.

In the meantime, here's a new patch for runtime.sgml, based on today's CVS:
1) drops SHOW_BTREE
2) drops HAS_RENDEZVOUS
3) Folds the redundant "Statistics" section into Logging and Query Tuning,
depending on the option.

--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

Attachments:

runtime-sgml.patchtext/x-diff; charset=iso-8859-1; name=runtime-sgml.patchDownload+97-110
#17Josh Berkus
josh@agliodbs.com
In reply to: Tom Lane (#15)
Re: Runtime.SGML diff ... please expedite!

Guys,

I've just discovered that I have some sort of library corruption on this
laptop in my SGML libraries. So could someone check my SGML with a "make
check" before applying that last patch?

--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

#18Josh Berkus
josh@agliodbs.com
In reply to: Tom Lane (#15)
Re: Runtime.SGML diff ... please expedite!

Folks,

Actually, I've just confirmed that that last patch has some syntax problems.
So please ignore it. I will send a good patch through Rod to check.

Sorry! I'll get the hang of this soon, really!

--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

#19Josh Berkus
josh@agliodbs.com
In reply to: Tom Lane (#15)
Re: Runtime.SGML diff ... please expedite!

Tom,

OK, this is the checked-by-Rod patch, which should be perfect.

--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

Attachments:

runtime-sgml.patchtext/x-diff; charset=iso-8859-1; name=runtime-sgml.patchDownload+97-110
#20Josh Berkus
josh@agliodbs.com
In reply to: Tom Lane (#12)
Re: Runtime.SGML diff ... please expedite!

Tom,

Also, one of the Red Hat guys pointed out to me that
SHOW_BTREE_BUILD_STATS seems to have crept back into runtime.sgml,
although it was removed during 7.4 development. Could we have that
out of there in the next patch?

Accoring to GUC.c this morning, the option is still there ... it's just been
re-named to "LOG_BTREE_BUILD_STATS". Is this a mistake in GUC.c, or should
I put it back in Runtime.SGML under the new name?

--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

#21Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: Josh Berkus (#20)
#22Josh Berkus
josh@agliodbs.com
In reply to: Tom Lane (#21)