Unix timestamp -> timestamp, per Tom Lane :)

Started by David Fetterover 22 years ago9 messagespatches
Jump to latest
#1David Fetter
david@fetter.org

Folks,

'nother one. Thanks very much, Tom! :)

Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter david@fetter.org http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100 cell: +1 415 235 3778

Attachments:

func_unixtimestamp.patchtext/plain; charset=us-asciiDownload+23-0
#2Peter Eisentraut
peter_e@gmx.net
In reply to: David Fetter (#1)
Re: Unix timestamp -> timestamp, per Tom Lane :)

David Fetter writes:

Folks,

'nother one. Thanks very much, Tom! :)

Cheers,
D

Can you adjust the patch so that it contains only the relevant parts and
creates valid DocBook?

#3David Fetter
david@fetter.org
In reply to: Peter Eisentraut (#2)
Re: Unix timestamp -> timestamp, per Tom Lane :)

On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 10:21:46PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

David Fetter writes:

Folks,

'nother one. Thanks very much, Tom! :)

Cheers,
D

Can you adjust the patch so that it contains only the relevant parts
and creates valid DocBook?

OK. How do I test this? After "make && make check" at the top level,
there is no html or pdf.

Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter david@fetter.org http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100 cell: +1 415 235 3778

#4Joe Conway
mail@joeconway.com
In reply to: David Fetter (#3)
Re: Unix timestamp -> timestamp, per Tom Lane :)

David Fetter wrote:

OK. How do I test this? After "make && make check" at the top level,
there is no html or pdf.

first do:
cd doc/src/sgml

See:
http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/docguide-build.html

HTH,

Joe

#5Bruce Momjian
bruce@momjian.us
In reply to: David Fetter (#1)
Re: Unix timestamp -> timestamp, per Tom Lane :)

Peter indicated it was not valid docbook and wanted only the relivant
parts, but it looked OK to me. Peter?

Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:

http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches

I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

David Fetter wrote:

Folks,

'nother one. Thanks very much, Tom! :)

Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter david@fetter.org http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100 cell: +1 415 235 3778

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
#6Peter Eisentraut
peter_e@gmx.net
In reply to: Bruce Momjian (#5)
Re: Unix timestamp -> timestamp, per Tom Lane :)

Bruce Momjian writes:

Peter indicated it was not valid docbook and wanted only the relivant
parts, but it looked OK to me. Peter?

That's what I said, that's what I meant.

#7Bruce Momjian
bruce@momjian.us
In reply to: Peter Eisentraut (#6)
Re: Unix timestamp -> timestamp, per Tom Lane :)

Peter Eisentraut wrote:

Bruce Momjian writes:

Peter indicated it was not valid docbook and wanted only the relivant
parts, but it looked OK to me. Peter?

That's what I said, that's what I meant.

Well, I can't see anything wrong with the SGML, and you are not telling
me what is wrong, so I guess I will just apply it and find out where the
SGML build fails.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
#8Peter Eisentraut
peter_e@gmx.net
In reply to: Bruce Momjian (#7)
Re: Unix timestamp -> timestamp, per Tom Lane :)

Bruce Momjian wrote:

Peter Eisentraut wrote:

Bruce Momjian writes:

Peter indicated it was not valid docbook and wanted only the
relivant parts, but it looked OK to me. Peter?

That's what I said, that's what I meant.

Well, I can't see anything wrong with the SGML, and you are not
telling me what is wrong, so I guess I will just apply it and find
out where the SGML build fails.

This patch is already taken care of.

#9Bruce Momjian
bruce@momjian.us
In reply to: David Fetter (#1)
Re: Unix timestamp -> timestamp, per Tom Lane :)

Applied by Peter.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

David Fetter wrote:

Folks,

'nother one. Thanks very much, Tom! :)

Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter david@fetter.org http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100 cell: +1 415 235 3778

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073