doc/src/sgml/ref/create_database.sgml had an extra <para> tag

Started by Jonathan Gardnerabout 22 years ago2 messagespatches
Jump to latest
#1Jonathan Gardner
jgardner@jonathangardner.net

This is the error that openjade produced:

openjade:ref/create_database.sgml:177:7:E: document type does not allow
element "PARA" here; missing one of "FOOTNOTE", "ITEMIZEDLIST",
"ORDEREDLIST", "VARIABLELIST", "CAUTION", "IMPORTANT", "NOTE", "TIP",
"WARNING", "BLOCKQUOTE", "INFORMALEXAMPLE" start-tag
openjade:ref/create_database.sgml:186:7:E: document type does not allow
element "PARA" here; missing one of "FOOTNOTE", "ITEMIZEDLIST",
"ORDEREDLIST", "VARIABLELIST", "CAUTION", "IMPORTANT", "NOTE", "TIP",
"WARNING", "BLOCKQUOTE", "INFORMALEXAMPLE" start-tag
openjade:ref/create_database.sgml:194:11:E: end tag for "PARA" omitted,
but OMITTAG NO was specified
openjade:ref/create_database.sgml:175:2: start tag was here

This patch removes the extra <para> tag that caused the error.

--
Jonathan Gardner
jgardner@jonathangardner.net

Attachments:

create_database.patchtext/x-diff; charset=us-ascii; name=create_database.patchDownload+0-2
#2Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: Jonathan Gardner (#1)
Re: doc/src/sgml/ref/create_database.sgml had an extra <para> tag

"Jonathan M. Gardner" <jgardner@jonathangardner.net> writes:

openjade:ref/create_database.sgml:194:11:E: end tag for "PARA" omitted,
but OMITTAG NO was specified
openjade:ref/create_database.sgml:175:2: start tag was here

Yeah, I see it too on my RHL 8 machine. The DTD being used at
postgresql.org seems to be less picky though, since that build
is going through without error ...

regards, tom lane