bug in opclass "alter table owner" handling?
Started by Alvaro Herreraabout 21 years ago2 messagespatches
Looks like a bug to me, at least -- opclasses are registered using the
opclass Oid, not the access method Oid, right?
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]alvh.no-ip.org>)
"The eagle never lost so much time, as
when he submitted to learn of the crow." (William Blake)
Attachments:
opclasscmds.patchtext/plain; charset=us-asciiDownload+4-2
Re: bug in opclass "alter table owner" handling?
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
Looks like a bug to me, at least -- opclasses are registered using the
opclass Oid, not the access method Oid, right?
Yup, definitely wrong. Patch applied --- thanks!
[ digs around ... ] The other calls of changeDependencyOnOwner seem
OK; I guess this one was just a thinko.
regards, tom lane