Error in ORDER BY on check constraints in psql
Everything is sorted by object name in \d <table> except check
constraints for some reason. It seems it's ordering by the wrong column.
Seems like a bug to me.
Attached is the trivial patch.
Chris
Attachments:
describe.txttext/plain; name=describe.txtDownload+2-2
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
Everything is sorted by object name in \d <table> except check
constraints for some reason. It seems it's ordering by the wrong column.
Seems like a bug to me.
That was probably done deliberately, back in the day when constraints
tended to have uselessly random names like "$1" --- sorting by the
constraint text was more helpful. I agree that now sorting by name
seems like the better thing.
Attached is the trivial patch.
I think there's nothing wrong with the "ORDER BY 1" part ... it's the
fact that the columns are selected in a different order than they'll
be used that seems bizarre to me. I fixed it like this instead.
regards, tom lane
*** src/bin/psql/describe.c.orig Fri Oct 14 23:00:19 2005
--- src/bin/psql/describe.c Thu Oct 20 01:09:29 2005
***************
*** 1036,1044 ****
if (tableinfo.checks)
{
printfPQExpBuffer(&buf,
! "SELECT "
! "pg_catalog.pg_get_constraintdef(r.oid, true), "
! "conname\n"
"FROM pg_catalog.pg_constraint r\n"
"WHERE r.conrelid = '%s' AND r.contype = 'c' ORDER BY 1",
oid);
--- 1036,1043 ----
if (tableinfo.checks)
{
printfPQExpBuffer(&buf,
! "SELECT r.conname, "
! "pg_catalog.pg_get_constraintdef(r.oid, true)\n"
"FROM pg_catalog.pg_constraint r\n"
"WHERE r.conrelid = '%s' AND r.contype = 'c' ORDER BY 1",
oid);
***************
*** 1192,1199 ****
for (i = 0; i < check_count; i++)
{
printfPQExpBuffer(&buf, _(" \"%s\" %s"),
! PQgetvalue(result2, i, 1),
! PQgetvalue(result2, i, 0)); footers[count_footers++] = pg_strdup(buf.data);
}
--- 1191,1198 ----
for (i = 0; i < check_count; i++)
{
printfPQExpBuffer(&buf, _(" \"%s\" %s"),
! PQgetvalue(result2, i, 0),
! PQgetvalue(result2, i, 1)); footers[count_footers++] = pg_strdup(buf.data);
}
That was probably done deliberately, back in the day when constraints
tended to have uselessly random names like "$1" --- sorting by the
constraint text was more helpful. I agree that now sorting by name
seems like the better thing.
Even in the "$x" case, it's better to have them sorted in that order
(ie. the order they were created...)
I think there's nothing wrong with the "ORDER BY 1" part ... it's the
fact that the columns are selected in a different order than they'll
be used that seems bizarre to me. I fixed it like this instead.
Ah, the way that requires effort :)
IBM has addressed the socket address storage issue as of AIX 5.3
maintenance level 5300-03; the following patch adds documentation to
FAQ_AIX...
cbbrowne@dba2:OXRS/sources/pgsql-HEAD/doc> cvs diff -u FAQ_AIX Thursday 12:22:52
Index: FAQ_AIX
===================================================================
RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql/doc/FAQ_AIX,v
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -c -u -r1.12 FAQ_AIX
cvs diff: conflicting specifications of output style
--- FAQ_AIX 30 Jul 2005 03:39:27 -0000 1.12
+++ FAQ_AIX 20 Oct 2005 16:23:01 -0000
@@ -83,6 +83,24 @@
IBM will be providing a fix in the next maintenance release (expected
in October 2005) with an updated socket.h.
---
+PMR29657 was resolved in APAR IY74147: INCOMPATIBILITY BETWEEN
+SOCKADDR_UN AND SOCKADDR_STORAGE STRUCT
+
+APAR information
+APAR number IY74147
+Reported component name AIX 5.3
+Reported component ID 5765G0300
+Reported release 530
+Status CLOSED PER
+PE NoPE
+HIPER NoHIPER
+Submitted date 2005-07-18
+Closed date 2005-07-18
+Last modified date 2005-09-06
+
+If you upgrade to maintenance level 5300-03, that will include this
+fix. Use the command "oslevel -r" to determine what maintenance level
+you are at.
+---
From: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@ca.afilias.info>
Date: 2005-07-15
--
output = reverse("moc.enworbbc" "@" "enworbbc")
http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/oses.html
Q: Why did they deprecate a.out support in linux?
A: Because a nasty coff is bad for your elf. --- James Simmons
Patch applied. Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chris Browne wrote:
IBM has addressed the socket address storage issue as of AIX 5.3
maintenance level 5300-03; the following patch adds documentation to
FAQ_AIX...cbbrowne@dba2:OXRS/sources/pgsql-HEAD/doc> cvs diff -u FAQ_AIX Thursday 12:22:52 Index: FAQ_AIX =================================================================== RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql/doc/FAQ_AIX,v retrieving revision 1.12 diff -c -u -r1.12 FAQ_AIX cvs diff: conflicting specifications of output style --- FAQ_AIX 30 Jul 2005 03:39:27 -0000 1.12 +++ FAQ_AIX 20 Oct 2005 16:23:01 -0000 @@ -83,6 +83,24 @@ IBM will be providing a fix in the next maintenance release (expected in October 2005) with an updated socket.h. --- +PMR29657 was resolved in APAR IY74147: INCOMPATIBILITY BETWEEN +SOCKADDR_UN AND SOCKADDR_STORAGE STRUCT + +APAR information +APAR number IY74147 +Reported component name AIX 5.3 +Reported component ID 5765G0300 +Reported release 530 +Status CLOSED PER +PE NoPE +HIPER NoHIPER +Submitted date 2005-07-18 +Closed date 2005-07-18 +Last modified date 2005-09-06 + +If you upgrade to maintenance level 5300-03, that will include this +fix. Use the command "oslevel -r" to determine what maintenance level +you are at. +--- From: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@ca.afilias.info> Date: 2005-07-15 -- output = reverse("moc.enworbbc" "@" "enworbbc") http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/oses.html Q: Why did they deprecate a.out support in linux? A: Because a nasty coff is bad for your elf. --- James Simmons---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073