reply to ...

On Tuesday 11 July 2006 18:20, Marc G. Fournier wrote:

checking ot make sure it works and gives the right answer ...

Kmail ignores it

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

'k, isn't the Reply-To header part of an RFC somewhere? Or is it really
an optional thing for an MUA to follow?

On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

On Tuesday 11 July 2006 18:20, Marc G. Fournier wrote:

checking ot make sure it works and gives the right answer ...

Kmail ignores it

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664

"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes:

'k, isn't the Reply-To header part of an RFC somewhere? Or is it really an
optional thing for an MUA to follow?

The relevant RFC would be 2822.

If mailers have started ignoring reply-to it would be *because* of lists that
set it. In the presence of such lists a mailer what's a mailer supposed to do
when you ask it to send a personal response to the author? How can it figure
out whether the list has done something wacky with the reply-to header or if
it's set as intended to the original author's desired contact point?

--
greg

On Tuesday 11 July 2006 21:19, Marc G. Fournier wrote:

'k, isn't the Reply-To header part of an RFC somewhere? Or is it really
an optional thing for an MUA to follow?

Well I didn't even seen the reply-to in the email when it came across. So that
may be one problem. But just as a note I found this:

A reply to must conform to the below... (e.g. just an email isn't enough).

Reply-To: "Mary Smith: Personal Account" <smith@home.example>

On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

On Tuesday 11 July 2006 18:20, Marc G. Fournier wrote:

checking ot make sure it works and gives the right answer ...

Kmail ignores it

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services
(http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org
MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org
ICQ . 7615664

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match

--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/