Proposed patch for rules with RETURNING
Attached is a draft patch that makes rules support RETURNING as per my
proposal of earlier today, ie, have the rewriter automatically adjust a
RETURNING clause present in an unconditional INSTEAD rule. The core of
the patch is barely twenty lines (the code added to rewriteRuleAction)
--- the rest is error checking to reject invalid rules.Comments, objections?
regards, tom lane
On 9/1/06, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Attached is a draft patch that makes rules support RETURNING ...
What format is that patch in? Either something's wrong or Gmail just
went really wacko.
--
Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1300
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
33 Wood Ave S, 2nd Floor | jharris@enterprisedb.com
Iselin, New Jersey 08830 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/
Jonah H. Harris wrote:
On 9/1/06, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Attached is a draft patch that makes rules support RETURNING ...
What format is that patch in? Either something's wrong or Gmail just
went really wacko.
I see the attachment fine.
--
Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
"Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com> writes:
On 9/1/06, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Attached is a draft patch that makes rules support RETURNING ...
What format is that patch in? Either something's wrong or Gmail just
went really wacko.
It's just a gzip'd patch diff.
regards, tom lane