pg_regress multibyte setting
Is it a good idea that we run make check with MULTIBYTE = SQL_ASCII by
default? We run it with the user's locale by default, so shouldn't we
use the encoding that belongs to the locale by default? Otherwise we
are testing a fairly unrepresentative environment. If you really want
to test SQL_ASCII you could of course choose it explicitly or set the
locale to C.
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 08:06, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
Is it a good idea that we run make check with MULTIBYTE = SQL_ASCII by
default? We run it with the user's locale by default, so shouldn't we
use the encoding that belongs to the locale by default? Otherwise we
are testing a fairly unrepresentative environment. If you really want
to test SQL_ASCII you could of course choose it explicitly or set the
locale to C.
It seems good to run make check successfully on many platforms,
but we might miss locale-dependent bugs.
Personally speaking, I often recommend to use UTF-8 + C locale combinations
for users, but I'm not sure it's the most common use-cases or not.
--
Itagaki Takahiro
On 01/12/2011 09:52 PM, Itagaki Takahiro wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 08:06, Peter Eisentraut<peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
Is it a good idea that we run make check with MULTIBYTE = SQL_ASCII by
default? We run it with the user's locale by default, so shouldn't we
use the encoding that belongs to the locale by default? Otherwise we
are testing a fairly unrepresentative environment. If you really want
to test SQL_ASCII you could of course choose it explicitly or set the
locale to C.It seems good to run make check successfully on many platforms,
but we might miss locale-dependent bugs.Personally speaking, I often recommend to use UTF-8 + C locale combinations
for users, but I'm not sure it's the most common use-cases or not.
We have had support for multi-byte testing in the buildfarm for about 2
years. My own Linux buildfarm member is configured to test in both
C/SQL_ASCII and en_US.utf8.
cheers
andrew