pgsql: Add traceback information to PL/Python errors
Add traceback information to PL/Python errors
This mimics the traceback information the Python interpreter prints
with exceptions.
Jan Urbański
Branch
------
master
Details
-------
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/2bd78eb8d51cc9ee03ba0287b23ff4c266dcd9b9
Modified Files
--------------
src/pl/plpython/expected/plpython_do.out | 5 +-
src/pl/plpython/expected/plpython_error.out | 193 +++++++++++++++-
src/pl/plpython/expected/plpython_error_0.out | 193 +++++++++++++++-
.../plpython/expected/plpython_subtransaction.out | 55 ++++-
.../expected/plpython_subtransaction_0.out | 30 ++-
.../expected/plpython_subtransaction_5.out | 30 ++-
src/pl/plpython/expected/plpython_test.out | 5 +-
src/pl/plpython/expected/plpython_types.out | 5 +-
src/pl/plpython/expected/plpython_types_3.out | 5 +-
src/pl/plpython/plpython.c | 236 +++++++++++++++++---
src/pl/plpython/sql/plpython_error.sql | 105 +++++++++
11 files changed, 786 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
Add traceback information to PL/Python errors
This mimics the traceback information the Python interpreter prints
with exceptions.Jan Urbański
On my system this spits out a warning:
plpython.c: In function ‘PLy_traceback’:
plpython.c:4487: warning: ‘s’ may be used uninitialized in this function
plpython.c:4487: note: ‘s’ was declared here
That appears to be a live bug, unless it's guaranteed that lineno will
always be > 0.
Also, the loop test should really be written as current < lineno,
rather than current != lineno, just in case we should manage to pass a
lineno < 0, which with the current code would go into the tank and
spin.
This part looks pretty sketchy, too:
while (s && isspace((unsigned char) *s))
s++;
Perhaps we meant to test *s here. It's hard to believe that we're
really intending to test whether the pointer has fallen off the end of
the address space and wrapped around to NULL.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
On 07/04/11 23:01, Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
Add traceback information to PL/Python errors
This mimics the traceback information the Python interpreter prints
with exceptions.Jan Urbański
On my system this spits out a warning:
plpython.c: In function ‘PLy_traceback’:
plpython.c:4487: warning: ‘s’ may be used uninitialized in this function
plpython.c:4487: note: ‘s’ was declared hereThat appears to be a live bug, unless it's guaranteed that lineno will
always be > 0.
lineno should be > 0, unless Python is trying to tell us that the code
frame originates from before the function.
Also, the loop test should really be written as current < lineno,
rather than current != lineno, just in case we should manage to pass a
lineno < 0, which with the current code would go into the tank and
spin.
Yeah, good point.
This part looks pretty sketchy, too:
while (s && isspace((unsigned char) *s))
s++;Perhaps we meant to test *s here. It's hard to believe that we're
really intending to test whether the pointer has fallen off the end of
the address space and wrapped around to NULL.
Gah, so short a function and so many things that I managed to get wrong.
There's also this:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-04/msg00334.php
Jan
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org> wrote:
On 07/04/11 23:01, Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
Add traceback information to PL/Python errors
This mimics the traceback information the Python interpreter prints
with exceptions.Jan Urbański
On my system this spits out a warning:
plpython.c: In function ‘PLy_traceback’:
plpython.c:4487: warning: ‘s’ may be used uninitialized in this function
plpython.c:4487: note: ‘s’ was declared hereThat appears to be a live bug, unless it's guaranteed that lineno will
always be > 0.lineno should be > 0, unless Python is trying to tell us that the code
frame originates from before the function.Also, the loop test should really be written as current < lineno,
rather than current != lineno, just in case we should manage to pass a
lineno < 0, which with the current code would go into the tank and
spin.Yeah, good point.
This part looks pretty sketchy, too:
while (s && isspace((unsigned char) *s))
s++;Perhaps we meant to test *s here. It's hard to believe that we're
really intending to test whether the pointer has fallen off the end of
the address space and wrapped around to NULL.Gah, so short a function and so many things that I managed to get wrong.
Patch?
There's also this:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-04/msg00334.php
Yep. I am assuming Peter will look at that one.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
On 08/04/11 00:25, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org> wrote:
On 07/04/11 23:01, Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
Add traceback information to PL/Python errors
This mimics the traceback information the Python interpreter prints
with exceptions.Jan Urbański
On my system this spits out a warning:
plpython.c: In function ‘PLy_traceback’:
plpython.c:4487: warning: ‘s’ may be used uninitialized in this function
plpython.c:4487: note: ‘s’ was declared hereThat appears to be a live bug, unless it's guaranteed that lineno will
always be > 0.lineno should be > 0, unless Python is trying to tell us that the code
frame originates from before the function.Also, the loop test should really be written as current < lineno,
rather than current != lineno, just in case we should manage to pass a
lineno < 0, which with the current code would go into the tank and
spin.Yeah, good point.
This part looks pretty sketchy, too:
while (s && isspace((unsigned char) *s))
s++;Perhaps we meant to test *s here. It's hard to believe that we're
really intending to test whether the pointer has fallen off the end of
the address space and wrapped around to NULL.Gah, so short a function and so many things that I managed to get wrong.
Patch?
Attached.
There's also this:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-04/msg00334.phpYep. I am assuming Peter will look at that one.
I guess so. This only fixes the things you noticed.
Jan