pgsql: Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2.
Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2.
This is open to debate of course, but it's past time we had *something*
here.
Branch
------
master
Details
-------
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/b33f611682d0c587bb1496ff529fab1970f0d44c
Modified Files
--------------
doc/src/sgml/release-9.2.sgml | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2.
This is open to debate of course, but it's past time we had *something*
here.
(yes, i've been backlogged)
We have cascading replication as a major feature, which I agree it is.
But I think we should add the (closely related) base backups from
slave to the list as well - I've had more people say they're really
going to use that one than the cascading replication. Perhaps add them
both on the same bullet point?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2.
This is open to debate of course, but it's past time we had *something*
here.
We have cascading replication as a major feature, which I agree it is.
But I think we should add the (closely related) base backups from
slave to the list as well - I've had more people say they're really
going to use that one than the cascading replication. Perhaps add them
both on the same bullet point?
Sure, reword it however you want. I've not been paying much attention
to replication stuff, so I don't really know what's important there.
regards, tom lane
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 12:11:45PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2.
This is open to debate of course, but it's past time we had *something*
here.We have cascading replication as a major feature, which I agree it is.
But I think we should add the (closely related) base backups from
slave to the list as well - I've had more people say they're really
going to use that one than the cascading replication. Perhaps add them
both on the same bullet point?Sure, reword it however you want. I've not been paying much attention
to replication stuff, so I don't really know what's important there.
FYI, I didn't get involved in making the 9.2 major features list because
I felt I already had a heavy hand in creating the original 9.2 release
notes.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2.
This is open to debate of course, but it's past time we had *something*
here.We have cascading replication as a major feature, which I agree it is.
But I think we should add the (closely related) base backups from
slave to the list as well - I've had more people say they're really
going to use that one than the cascading replication. Perhaps add them
both on the same bullet point?Sure, reword it however you want. I've not been paying much attention
to replication stuff, so I don't really know what's important there.
Done.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/