proposal: option --application_name for psql
Hello
we like to use psql in combination with bash - just like postgresql driver.
Actually there is no simple possibility (from command line) to set
application_name. We would to use different name than psql - for
example "splunk", ...
I tested PGAPPNAME, but it doesn't work.
so my propose:
1) fix psql to respect PGAPPNAME
2) enhance --application_name parameter
Options, ideas, comments ?
Regards
Pavel
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 14, 2013 21:04, Pavel Stehule wrote:
Hello
we like to use psql in combination with bash - just like postgresql driver.
Actually there is no simple possibility (from command line) to set
application_name. We would to use different name than psql - for
example "splunk", ...I tested PGAPPNAME, but it doesn't work.
It does work:
$ PGAPPNAME=splunk psql -c "select application_name from pg_stat_activity;"
application_name
------------------
splunk
(1 row)
But perhaps I misunderstood your intention?
Thanks,
Erik Rijkers
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
2013/5/14 Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>:
On Tue, May 14, 2013 21:04, Pavel Stehule wrote:
Hello
we like to use psql in combination with bash - just like postgresql driver.
Actually there is no simple possibility (from command line) to set
application_name. We would to use different name than psql - for
example "splunk", ...I tested PGAPPNAME, but it doesn't work.
It does work:
$ PGAPPNAME=splunk psql -c "select application_name from pg_stat_activity;"
application_name
------------------
splunk
(1 row)But perhaps I misunderstood your intention?
I was wrong - PGAPPNAME works, thank you
but command line --application_name option should be a useful option I
am thinking still
Regards
Pavel
Thanks,
Erik Rijkers
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:25 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
2013/5/14 Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>:
On Tue, May 14, 2013 21:04, Pavel Stehule wrote:
Hello
we like to use psql in combination with bash - just like postgresql driver.
Actually there is no simple possibility (from command line) to set
application_name. We would to use different name than psql - for
example "splunk", ...I tested PGAPPNAME, but it doesn't work.
It does work:
$ PGAPPNAME=splunk psql -c "select application_name from pg_stat_activity;"
application_name
------------------
splunk
(1 row)But perhaps I misunderstood your intention?
I was wrong - PGAPPNAME works, thank you
but command line --application_name option should be a useful option I
am thinking still
That goes for a lot of the parameters that go in a connection string,
I'm not sure application_name is common enough to have it's own
argument if other parameters don't. And you can still set it as long
as you use psql in "connection string mode", as you can with all the
libpq parameters.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
2013/5/14 Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>:
psql in "connection string mode"
Hi Magnus, can me send some link?
Thank you
Pavel
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
2013/5/14 Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>:
psql in "connection string mode"
Hi Magnus, can me send some link?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/app-psql.html
"If this parameter contains an = sign or starts with a valid URI
prefix (postgresql:// or postgres://), it is treated as a conninfo
string. See Section 31.1 for more information."
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
2013/5/14 Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>:
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
2013/5/14 Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>:
psql in "connection string mode"
Hi Magnus, can me send some link?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/app-psql.html
"If this parameter contains an = sign or starts with a valid URI
prefix (postgresql:// or postgres://), it is treated as a conninfo
string. See Section 31.1 for more information."
I was blind, thank you
Pavel
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
2013/5/14 Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>:
2013/5/14 Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>:
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
2013/5/14 Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>:
psql in "connection string mode"
Hi Magnus, can me send some link?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/app-psql.html
"If this parameter contains an = sign or starts with a valid URI
prefix (postgresql:// or postgres://), it is treated as a conninfo
string. See Section 31.1 for more information."I was blind, thank you
After comments from Erik and Magnus my proposal has no sense.
Regards
Pavel
Pavel
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers