Time for beta2 ?

Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> writes:

We've almost cleared the open items list, and I'm not aware of any other
unfixed issues in 9.3beta1. Could we make a beta2 release soon? There
have been a bunch of recovery-related fixes since beta1, it would be
nice to get those fixes in the hands of testers.

There are at least two initdb-forcing things on the table, which I think
we need to resolve before we push beta2:

1. The business around being able to tell whether views and foreign
tables are updatable; all of the proposals for this will require
adding/changing some pg_proc entries and probably changing system view
definitions.

2. Simon was suggesting some changes in the functions for reporting
whether a backup is in progress.

Has anyone got anything else of that ilk?

regards, tom lane

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

On 2013-06-05 09:50:07 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> writes:

We've almost cleared the open items list, and I'm not aware of any other
unfixed issues in 9.3beta1. Could we make a beta2 release soon? There
have been a bunch of recovery-related fixes since beta1, it would be
nice to get those fixes in the hands of testers.

There are at least two initdb-forcing things on the table, which I think
we need to resolve before we push beta2:

Has anyone got anything else of that ilk?

While obviously not really dependent on beta2 I'd like to see
20130402182644.GJ2415@alap2.anarazel.de applied to HEAD in time for beta
2 so it can get some coverage before the next set of back branch releases.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers