is a special cost for external sort?
Hello
I found a slow query with large external sort. I expect, so external
sort should be penalized. Is it?
Regards
Pavel
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
I found a slow query with large external sort. I expect, so external
sort should be penalized. Is it?
See cost_sort() in src/backend/optimizer/path/costsize.c
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello
I found a slow query with large external sort. I expect, so external
sort should be penalized. Is it?
It tries to, but it doesn't seem to be much good at it. In
particular, I think it does a poor job of estimating the CPU cost of
an external sort relative to an in-memory sort of a slightly smaller
data set. In my experience adding the single tuple that actually
pushes you over the work_mem limit costs about 3x in CPU.
It is one of those things I started looking into a few times, but
never got anywhere before getting distracted.
Cheers,
Jeff
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers