Why does xlog.c not treat COMMIT_PREPARED/ABORT_PREPARED as commit/abort?
There's a bunch of code in xlog.c that special-cases commit/abort records
for purposes of controlling replay, ie whether you can pause before/after
a particular xlog record, extract a timestamp from it, etc. This code
does not, and apparently never has, counted COMMIT_PREPARED or
ABORT_PREPARED as commit/abort records. Is there a good reason for that,
or is it just an oversight?
I noticed this in investigation of bug #11032, which is a side effect
of the fact that xlog.c doesn't believe there's any timestamp to be
found in COMMIT_PREPARED records. But more generally, they can't be
used as recovery targets, and I don't see a reason for that.
Assuming we agree that this is a bug, is it something to back-patch,
or do we not want to change back-branch behavior here?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On 2014-07-24 17:53:17 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
There's a bunch of code in xlog.c that special-cases commit/abort records
for purposes of controlling replay, ie whether you can pause before/after
a particular xlog record, extract a timestamp from it, etc. This code
does not, and apparently never has, counted COMMIT_PREPARED or
ABORT_PREPARED as commit/abort records. Is there a good reason for that,
or is it just an oversight?
Seems like an oversight to me.
I noticed this in investigation of bug #11032, which is a side effect
of the fact that xlog.c doesn't believe there's any timestamp to be
found in COMMIT_PREPARED records. But more generally, they can't be
used as recovery targets, and I don't see a reason for that.
Assuming we agree that this is a bug, is it something to back-patch,
or do we not want to change back-branch behavior here?
I started to argue that we should change the cases where
SetLatestXTime() but not stop for prepared xacts but couldn't really
think of a reason why it'd be a good plan. So I ovte for backpatching
the whole thing.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers