OpenSSL support in our back branches
I see that buildfarm member anchovy has been failing in pre-9.5
branches for the last several weeks, with symptoms suggesting that
it's been updated to openssl 1.1.0 or later. The failures are
unsurprising given that commit 593d4e47d wasn't back-patched further
than 9.5, but I wonder whether it isn't time to do that now.
Alternatively, we could ask anchovy's owner to remove --with-openssl
from its configuration for pre-9.5 branches, but there are going to
be more and more buildfarm critters with this issue.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On 2017-04-15 18:04:00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
I see that buildfarm member anchovy has been failing in pre-9.5
branches for the last several weeks, with symptoms suggesting that
it's been updated to openssl 1.1.0 or later. The failures are
unsurprising given that commit 593d4e47d wasn't back-patched further
than 9.5, but I wonder whether it isn't time to do that now.
+1.
I think Andreas already did some of the required work in
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/0c817abb-3f7d-20fb-583a-58f7593a0bea%40proxel.se
Alternatively, we could ask anchovy's owner to remove --with-openssl
from its configuration for pre-9.5 branches, but there are going to
be more and more buildfarm critters with this issue.
Not just critters, there'll likely also be distributions running into
the issues, too :(
- Andres
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
On 2017-04-15 18:04:00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
I see that buildfarm member anchovy has been failing in pre-9.5
branches for the last several weeks, with symptoms suggesting that
it's been updated to openssl 1.1.0 or later. The failures are
unsurprising given that commit 593d4e47d wasn't back-patched further
than 9.5, but I wonder whether it isn't time to do that now.
+1.
I think Andreas already did some of the required work in
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/0c817abb-3f7d-20fb-583a-58f7593a0bea%40proxel.se
Oh, right. I'll see what I can do with that.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers