Unqualified pg_catalog casts in pg_dump
When looking at something different, I happened to notice that pg_dump is a bit
inconsistent in how it qualifies casts to pg_catalog entities like regclass and
oid. Most casts are qualified, but not all. Even though it functionally is
the same, being consistent is a good thing IMO and I can't see a reason not to,
so the attached patch adds qualifications (the unqualified regclass cast in the
TAP test left on purpose).
cheers ./daniel
Attachments:
pg_dump_casts.patchapplication/octet-stream; name=pg_dump_casts.patch; x-unix-mode=0644Download+50-51
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
When looking at something different, I happened to notice that pg_dump is a bit
inconsistent in how it qualifies casts to pg_catalog entities like regclass and
oid. Most casts are qualified, but not all. Even though it functionally is
the same, being consistent is a good thing IMO and I can't see a reason not to,
so the attached patch adds qualifications (the unqualified regclass cast in the
TAP test left on purpose).
While this used to be important before we made pg_dump force a minimal
search_path, I'm not sure that there's any point in being picky about
it anymore. (psql's describe.c is a different story though.)
regards, tom lane
On 23 Mar 2020, at 17:54, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
When looking at something different, I happened to notice that pg_dump is a bit
inconsistent in how it qualifies casts to pg_catalog entities like regclass and
oid. Most casts are qualified, but not all. Even though it functionally is
the same, being consistent is a good thing IMO and I can't see a reason not to,
so the attached patch adds qualifications (the unqualified regclass cast in the
TAP test left on purpose).While this used to be important before we made pg_dump force a minimal
search_path, I'm not sure that there's any point in being picky about
it anymore. (psql's describe.c is a different story though.)
Correct, there is no functional importance with this. IMO the value is in
readability and grep-ability.
cheers ./daniel