snowball release
Snowball has made a release! With a tag!
I have prepared a patch to update PostgreSQL's copy. (not attached
here, 566230 bytes, but see
https://github.com/petere/postgresql/commit/52a6133b58c77ada4210a96e5155cbe4da5e5583)
Since we last updated our copy from their commit date 2019-06-24 and the
release is from 2019-10-02, the changes are pretty small and mostly
reformatting. But there are three new stemmers: Basque, Catalan, Hindi.
I think some consideration could be given for including this into PG13.
Otherwise, I'll park it for PG14.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
Snowball has made a release! With a tag!
I have prepared a patch to update PostgreSQL's copy.
Yeah, this was on my to-do list as well. Thanks for doing it.
I think some consideration could be given for including this into PG13.
Otherwise, I'll park it for PG14.
Meh, I think v14 at this point. It looks more like new features
than bug fixes.
regards, tom lane
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 5:11 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
Snowball has made a release! With a tag!
I have prepared a patch to update PostgreSQL's copy.Yeah, this was on my to-do list as well. Thanks for doing it.
+1
I think some consideration could be given for including this into PG13.
Otherwise, I'll park it for PG14.Meh, I think v14 at this point. It looks more like new features
than bug fixes.
I would vote for including these new languages. There is no risk to let
people try and test them.
regards, tom lane
--
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
On 2020-05-22 14:40, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Snowball has made a release! With a tag!
I have prepared a patch to update PostgreSQL's copy. (not attached
here, 566230 bytes, but see
https://github.com/petere/postgresql/commit/52a6133b58c77ada4210a96e5155cbe4da5e5583)Since we last updated our copy from their commit date 2019-06-24 and the
release is from 2019-10-02, the changes are pretty small and mostly
reformatting. But there are three new stemmers: Basque, Catalan, Hindi.I think some consideration could be given for including this into PG13.
Otherwise, I'll park it for PG14.
committed to master
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
On 2020-05-22 14:40, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
I think some consideration could be given for including this into PG13.
Otherwise, I'll park it for PG14.
committed to master
Hm, I don't see any documentation change in that commit --- don't
we have (at least) a list of the stemmers somewhere in the SGML docs?
regards, tom lane
On 8 Jun 2020, at 16:33, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
On 2020-05-22 14:40, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
I think some consideration could be given for including this into PG13.
Otherwise, I'll park it for PG14.committed to master
Hm, I don't see any documentation change in that commit --- don't
we have (at least) a list of the stemmers somewhere in the SGML docs?
IIRC we refer to the Snowball site, and only have a list in the \dFd output,
but that can be argued to be an example and not expected to be updated to
match. Perhaps we should though?
cheers ./daniel
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
On 8 Jun 2020, at 16:33, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Hm, I don't see any documentation change in that commit --- don't
we have (at least) a list of the stemmers somewhere in the SGML docs?
IIRC we refer to the Snowball site, and only have a list in the \dFd output,
but that can be argued to be an example and not expected to be updated to
match. Perhaps we should though?
Looking in the commit logs, our past updates 7b925e127 and
fd582317e just updated that \dFd sample. So I guess that's the
minimum expectation. Maybe we should think about having a more
formal list in the actual Snowball section (12.6.6)?
regards, tom lane
On 2020-06-08 17:19, Tom Lane wrote:
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
On 8 Jun 2020, at 16:33, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Hm, I don't see any documentation change in that commit --- don't
we have (at least) a list of the stemmers somewhere in the SGML docs?IIRC we refer to the Snowball site, and only have a list in the \dFd output,
but that can be argued to be an example and not expected to be updated to
match. Perhaps we should though?Looking in the commit logs, our past updates 7b925e127 and
fd582317e just updated that \dFd sample. So I guess that's the
minimum expectation.
done
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services