Made ecpg compatibility mode and run-time behaviour options case insensitive
Hi Hackers
When reading code related ECPG I found 75220fb was committed in PG13 and master.
I don't know why it shouldn't be backpatched in PG12 or before.
Can anyone take a look at this and kindly tell me why.
Regards,
Tang
"Tang, Haiying" <tanghy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> writes:
When reading code related ECPG I found 75220fb was committed in PG13 and master.
I don't know why it shouldn't be backpatched in PG12 or before.
Can anyone take a look at this and kindly tell me why.
We don't usually back-patch things that aren't clear bug fixes.
regards, tom lane
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Sent: Tuesday, February 9, 2021 1:14 AM
When reading code related ECPG I found 75220fb was committed in PG13 and master.
I don't know why it shouldn't be backpatched in PG12 or before.
Can anyone take a look at this and kindly tell me why.We don't usually back-patch things that aren't clear bug fixes.
Thanks for your kindly explanation. Get it now.
Regards,
Tang