Addition of PostgreSQL::Test::Cluster::pg_version()
Hi all,
(Added Andrew in CC.)
While working more on expanding the tests of pg_upgrade for
cross-version checks, I have noticed that we don't expose a routine
able to get back _pg_version from a node, which should remain a
private field of Cluster.pm. We already do that for install_path, as
of case added by 87076c4.
Any objections or comments about the addition of a routine to get the
PostgreSQL::Version, as of the attached?
Thanks,
--
Michael
Attachments:
tap-pg-version.patchtext/x-diff; charset=us-asciiDownload+14-0
On 19 May 2022, at 03:38, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
Any objections or comments about the addition of a routine to get the
PostgreSQL::Version, as of the attached?
I haven't tested the patch, but +1 on the idea.
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
On 2022-05-18 We 21:38, Michael Paquier wrote:
Hi all,
(Added Andrew in CC.)While working more on expanding the tests of pg_upgrade for
cross-version checks, I have noticed that we don't expose a routine
able to get back _pg_version from a node, which should remain a
private field of Cluster.pm. We already do that for install_path, as
of case added by 87076c4.Any objections or comments about the addition of a routine to get the
PostgreSQL::Version, as of the attached?
Looks ok. PostgreSQL::Version is designed so that the object behaves
sanely in comparisons and when interpolated into a string.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 07:28:53AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Looks ok. PostgreSQL::Version is designed so that the object behaves
sanely in comparisons and when interpolated into a string.
I saw that, and that's kind of nice when it comes to write
version-specific code paths in the tests ;)
--
Michael
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 07:28:53AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Looks ok. PostgreSQL::Version is designed so that the object behaves
sanely in comparisons and when interpolated into a string.
Okay, I have applied this thing. I'll move back to my business with
the tests of pg_upgrade...
--
Michael