shoud be get_extension_schema visible?
Hi
more times I needed to get the extension's assigned namespace. There is
already a cooked function get_extension_schema, but it is static.
I need to find a function with a known name, but possibly an unknown schema
from a known extension.
Regards
Pavel
Hi
pá 17. 2. 2023 v 6:45 odesílatel Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
napsal:
Hi
more times I needed to get the extension's assigned namespace. There is
already a cooked function get_extension_schema, but it is static.I need to find a function with a known name, but possibly an unknown
schema from a known extension.
Here is an patch
Regards
Pavel
Show quoted text
Regards
Pavel
Attachments:
public_get_extension_schema.patchtext/x-patch; charset=US-ASCII; name=public_get_extension_schema.patchDownload+2-1
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 06:40:39AM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
p� 17. 2. 2023 v 6:45 odes�latel Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
napsal:more times I needed to get the extension's assigned namespace. There is
already a cooked function get_extension_schema, but it is static.I need to find a function with a known name, but possibly an unknown
schema from a known extension.Here is an patch
The patch is trivial so I don't have much to say about it, and it also seems
quite reasonable generally.
Note for other reviewers / committers: this is a something actually already
wanted for 3rd party code. As an example, here's Pavel's code in plpgsql_check
extension that internally has to duplicate this function (and deal with
compatibility):
https://github.com/okbob/plpgsql_check/blob/master/src/catalog.c#L205
I'm marking this entry as Ready For Committer.
po 6. 3. 2023 v 8:33 odesílatel Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> napsal:
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 06:40:39AM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
pá 17. 2. 2023 v 6:45 odesílatel Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
napsal:more times I needed to get the extension's assigned namespace. There is
already a cooked function get_extension_schema, but it is static.I need to find a function with a known name, but possibly an unknown
schema from a known extension.Here is an patch
The patch is trivial so I don't have much to say about it, and it also
seems
quite reasonable generally.Note for other reviewers / committers: this is a something actually already
wanted for 3rd party code. As an example, here's Pavel's code in
plpgsql_check
extension that internally has to duplicate this function (and deal with
compatibility):
https://github.com/okbob/plpgsql_check/blob/master/src/catalog.c#L205I'm marking this entry as Ready For Committer.
Thank you very much
Pavel
On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 08:34:49AM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
Note for other reviewers / committers: this is a something actually already
wanted for 3rd party code. As an example, here's Pavel's code in
plpgsql_check
extension that internally has to duplicate this function (and deal with
compatibility):
https://github.com/okbob/plpgsql_check/blob/master/src/catalog.c#L205
I can see why you'd want that, so OK from here to provide this routine
for external consumption. Let's first wait a bit and see if others
have any kind of objections or comments.
--
Michael
On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 04:44:59PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
I can see why you'd want that, so OK from here to provide this routine
for external consumption. Let's first wait a bit and see if others
have any kind of objections or comments.
Done this one as of e20b1ea.
--
Michael
st 8. 3. 2023 v 2:04 odesílatel Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
napsal:
On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 04:44:59PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
I can see why you'd want that, so OK from here to provide this routine
for external consumption. Let's first wait a bit and see if others
have any kind of objections or comments.Done this one as of e20b1ea.
Thank you very much
Pavel
Show quoted text
--
Michael