Doc: vcregress .bat commands list lacks "taptest"
Hi,
I found that "taptest" is missing in vcregress.bat command list in the
documentation when I tested psql and pgbench on Windows. I know there
is a plan to remove MSVC scripts[1]/messages/by-id/ZQzp_VMJcerM1Cs_@paquier.xyz, but is it worth adding one line
to the list for now?
[1]: /messages/by-id/ZQzp_VMJcerM1Cs_@paquier.xyz
I attached a patch for this case.
Regards,
Yugo Nagata
--
Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
Attachments:
doc_install-windows_taptest.patchtext/x-diff; name=doc_install-windows_taptest.patchDownload
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/install-windows.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/install-windows.sgml
index 379a2ea80b..435a91228a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/install-windows.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/install-windows.sgml
@@ -463,6 +463,7 @@ $ENV{CONFIG}="Debug";
<userinput>vcregress isolationcheck</userinput>
<userinput>vcregress bincheck</userinput>
<userinput>vcregress recoverycheck</userinput>
+<userinput>vcregress taptest</userinput>
</screen>
To change the schedule used (default is parallel), append it to the
@@ -477,8 +478,9 @@ $ENV{CONFIG}="Debug";
<para>
Running the regression tests on client programs, with
- <command>vcregress bincheck</command>, or on recovery tests, with
- <command>vcregress recoverycheck</command>, requires an additional Perl module
+ <command>vcregress bincheck</command>, on recovery tests, with
+ <command>vcregress recoverycheck</command>, or TAP tests specified with
+ <command>vcregress taptest</command> requires an additional Perl module
to be installed:
<variablelist>
<varlistentry>
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 03:32:04PM +0900, Yugo NAGATA wrote:
I found that "taptest" is missing in vcregress.bat command list in the
documentation when I tested psql and pgbench on Windows. I know there
is a plan to remove MSVC scripts[1], but is it worth adding one line
to the list for now?[1] /messages/by-id/ZQzp_VMJcerM1Cs_@paquier.xyz
I attached a patch for this case.
Assuming that the MSVC scripts are gone in v17, and assuming that your
suggestion is backpatched, it would still be useful for 5 years until
v16 is EOL'd. So I would say yes, but with a backpatch.
--
Michael
On 25 Sep 2023, at 08:58, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
I would say yes, but with a backpatch.
Agreed.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
On 2023-09-25 Mo 03:14, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
On 25 Sep 2023, at 08:58, Michael Paquier<michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
I would say yes, but with a backpatch.Agreed.
+1
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB:https://www.enterprisedb.com
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 11:07:57AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
+1
Thanks, applied and backpatched then.
--
Michael
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 08:18:01 +0900
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 11:07:57AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
+1
Thanks, applied and backpatched then.
Thank you!
Regards,
Yugo Nagata
--
Michael
--
Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>