cost_incremental_sort() and limit_tuples

Started by Antonin Houskaover 2 years ago1 messageshackers
Beta feature

Hackorum builds and tests every patch posted to the lists, not only commitfest submissions. This is Hackorum's own CI rather than the PostgreSQL project's, and it is still under testing - please report anything that looks wrong.

appliestests failedCI history

You can run a PostgreSQL built from this patch straight from Docker, with no checkout and no build:

docker run --rm -p 5432:5432 ghcr.io/hackorum-dev/postgres-patch:t48845
psql -h localhost -U postgres

Built from patchset v1 (message #1), August 24, 2026 at 08:46 AM.

Every patchset is also pushed to a branch of our PostgreSQL fork, so you can check out the same tree CI built. Without a PostgreSQL checkout:

git clone --branch t48845_1 https://github.com/hackorum-dev/postgres.git

In a checkout you already have, add the fork once:

git remote add hackorum https://github.com/hackorum-dev/postgres.git

then, for this patchset and every later one:

git fetch hackorum t48845_1 && git checkout t48845_1

Patchset v1 (message #1) is on t48845_1

Jump to latest
#1Antonin Houska
ah@cybertec.at

I think that cost_incremental_sort() does not account for the limit_tuples
argument properly. Attached is my proposal to fix the problem.

--
Antonin Houska
Web: https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com

Attachments:

t48845_1
cost_incremental_sort_limit_tuple.difftext/x-diffDownload+31-1