Resetting synchronous_standby_names can wait for CHECKPOINT to finish

Started by Yusuke Egashira (Fujitsu)almost 2 years ago2 messages
Jump to latest
#1Yusuke Egashira (Fujitsu)
egashira.yusuke@fujitsu.com

Hello, hackers.

When the checkpointer process is busy, even if we reset synchronous_standby_names, the resumption of the backend processes waiting in SyncRep are made to wait until the checkpoint is completed.
This prevents the prompt resumption of application processing when a problem occurs on the standby server in a synchronous replication system.
I confirmed this in PostgreSQL 12.18.

This issue has actually become a major problem for our customer.
When a problem occurred in the replication network, even after resetting synchronous_standby_names, the backend processes did not respond, resulting in timeout errors in many client applications.
The customer has also set the checkpoint_completion_target parameter to 0.9, and it seems to have been working fine under normal conditions.
However, there was a time when VACUUM was concentrated on a huge table. At that time, more than five times the max_wal_size of WAL output occurred during checkpoint processing.
Unfortunately, communication with the synchronous standby was lost during that checkpoint processing, and despite resetting the synchronous_standby_names, multiple client applications could not return a response while waiting for SyncRep.

I wrote a script(reset-synchronous_standby_names-during-checkpoint.sh) to illustrate the issue.
The script stops the synchronous standby during a transaction, and then resets synchronous_standby_names during checkpoint.
When I run this on my 1-core RHEL7 machine, I see that COMMIT does wait until the CHECKPOINT finishes, even though synchronous_standby_names has been reset.

I am attaching a patch (REL_12_STABLE) for the simplest seeming solution.
This moves the handling of SIGHUP reception by the checkpointer outside of the sleep process.
However, I am concerned that this change could affect the performance of checkpoint execution when there is a delay in the checkpoint schedule.
Can PostgreSQL tolerate this overhead?

Regards,
Yusuke Egashira.

Attachments:

reset-synchronous_standby_names-during-checkpoint.shapplication/octet-stream; name=reset-synchronous_standby_names-during-checkpoint.shDownload
v1-reset-synchronous_standby_names-timing.patchapplication/octet-stream; name=v1-reset-synchronous_standby_names-timing.patchDownload+8-7
#2Yusuke Egashira (Fujitsu)
egashira.yusuke@fujitsu.com
In reply to: Yusuke Egashira (Fujitsu) (#1)
RE: Resetting synchronous_standby_names can wait for CHECKPOINT to finish

Hello,

When the checkpointer process is busy, even if we reset synchronous_standby_names, the resumption of the backend processes waiting in SyncRep are made to wait until the checkpoint is completed.
This prevents the prompt resumption of application processing when a problem occurs on the standby server in a synchronous replication system.
I confirmed this in PostgreSQL 12.18.

I have tested this issue on Postgres built from the master branch (17devel) and observed the same behavior where the backend SyncRep release is blocked until CHECKPOINT completion.

In situations where a synchronous standby instance encounters an error and needs to be detached, I believe that the current behavior of waiting for SyncRep is inappropriate as it delays the backend.
I don't think changing the position of SIGHUP processing in the Checkpointer process carries much risk. Is there any oversight in my perception?

Regards,
Yusuke Egashira.