Okay to remove mention of mystery @ and ~ operators?
Hello
This page says that the `@` and `~` operators on various types can be
accelerated by a GiST index.
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/gist-builtin-opclasses.html
These operators have been listed in the file since it was created in 2014,
but if they exist then I don't know how to use them or what they do.
Code examples, for clarity:
select box '(0,0),(1, 1)' ~ box '(2,2),(3,3)';
operator does not exist: box ~ box
select box '(0,0),(1, 1)' @ box '(2,2),(3,3)';
operator does not exist: box @ box
If they're a typo or some removed thing then I'd like to remove them from
the page. This email is me asking to find out if I'm wrong about that
before I try to submit a patch (also very happy for someone with a
committer bit to just fix this).
Cheers,
Col
Hi,
This page says that the `@` and `~` operators on various types can be accelerated by a GiST index.
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/gist-builtin-opclasses.html
These operators have been listed in the file since it was created in 2014, but if they exist then I don't know how to use them or what they do.
Code examples, for clarity:
select box '(0,0),(1, 1)' ~ box '(2,2),(3,3)';
operator does not exist: box ~ box
select box '(0,0),(1, 1)' @ box '(2,2),(3,3)';
operator does not exist: box @ box
If they're a typo or some removed thing then I'd like to remove them from the page. This email is me asking to find out if I'm wrong about that before I try to submit a patch (also very happy for someone with a committer bit to just fix this).
Indeed, there is no @(box,box) or ~(box,box) in the \dAo output. These
operators were removed by 2f70fdb0644c back in 2020.
I will submit a patch for the documentation shortly. Thanks for reporting.
--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev
Hi,
This page says that the `@` and `~` operators on various types can be accelerated by a GiST index.
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/gist-builtin-opclasses.html
These operators have been listed in the file since it was created in 2014, but if they exist then I don't know how to use them or what they do.
Code examples, for clarity:
select box '(0,0),(1, 1)' ~ box '(2,2),(3,3)';
operator does not exist: box ~ box
select box '(0,0),(1, 1)' @ box '(2,2),(3,3)';
operator does not exist: box @ box
If they're a typo or some removed thing then I'd like to remove them from the page. This email is me asking to find out if I'm wrong about that before I try to submit a patch (also very happy for someone with a committer bit to just fix this).
Indeed, there is no @(box,box) or ~(box,box) in the \dAo output. These
operators were removed by 2f70fdb0644c back in 2020.I will submit a patch for the documentation shortly. Thanks for reporting.
Here is the patch.
--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev
Attachments:
v1-0001-Remove-mention-of-and-operators.patchapplication/octet-stream; name=v1-0001-Remove-mention-of-and-operators.patchDownload+6-13
On 19 Apr 2024, at 12:31, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com> wrote:
Hi,
This page says that the `@` and `~` operators on various types can be accelerated by a GiST index.
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/gist-builtin-opclasses.html
These operators have been listed in the file since it was created in 2014, but if they exist then I don't know how to use them or what they do.
Code examples, for clarity:
select box '(0,0),(1, 1)' ~ box '(2,2),(3,3)';
operator does not exist: box ~ box
select box '(0,0),(1, 1)' @ box '(2,2),(3,3)';
operator does not exist: box @ box
If they're a typo or some removed thing then I'd like to remove them from the page. This email is me asking to find out if I'm wrong about that before I try to submit a patch (also very happy for someone with a committer bit to just fix this).
Indeed, there is no @(box,box) or ~(box,box) in the \dAo output. These
operators were removed by 2f70fdb0644c back in 2020.I will submit a patch for the documentation shortly. Thanks for reporting.
Here is the patch.
Nice catch, and thanks for the patch. I'll apply it with a backpatch to when
they were removed.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
On 19 Apr 2024, at 13:49, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
On 19 Apr 2024, at 12:31, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com> wrote:
Here is the patch.
Nice catch, and thanks for the patch. I'll apply it with a backpatch to when
they were removed.
Done, thanks for the report and the patch!
--
Daniel Gustafsson
Thanks all!
On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 at 13:59, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
Show quoted text
On 19 Apr 2024, at 13:49, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
On 19 Apr 2024, at 12:31, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>
wrote:
Here is the patch.
Nice catch, and thanks for the patch. I'll apply it with a backpatch to
when
they were removed.
Done, thanks for the report and the patch!
--
Daniel Gustafsson