a potential typo in comments of pg_parse_json
Started by Junwang Zhaoover 1 year ago2 messages
Not 100% sure, sorry if this doesn't make sense.
--- a/src/common/jsonapi.c
+++ b/src/common/jsonapi.c
@@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ freeJsonLexContext(JsonLexContext *lex)
*
* If FORCE_JSON_PSTACK is defined then the routine will call the non-recursive
* JSON parser. This is a useful way to validate that it's doing the right
- * think at least for non-incremental cases. If this is on we expect to see
+ * thing at least for non-incremental cases. If this is on we expect to see
* regression diffs relating to error messages about stack depth, but no
* other differences.
*/--
Regards
Junwang Zhao
Re: a potential typo in comments of pg_parse_json
On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 5:25 PM Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com> wrote:
Not 100% sure, sorry if this doesn't make sense.
--- a/src/common/jsonapi.c +++ b/src/common/jsonapi.c @@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ freeJsonLexContext(JsonLexContext *lex) * * If FORCE_JSON_PSTACK is defined then the routine will call the non-recursive * JSON parser. This is a useful way to validate that it's doing the right - * think at least for non-incremental cases. If this is on we expect to see + * thing at least for non-incremental cases. If this is on we expect to see * regression diffs relating to error messages about stack depth, but no * other differences. */
Good catch. Fixed.
--
Thanks, Amit Langote