Fix grammar in comment describing LP_DEAD hint safety
Hackorum builds and tests every patch posted to the lists, not only commitfest submissions. This is Hackorum's own CI rather than the PostgreSQL project's, and it is still under testing - please report anything that looks wrong.
You can run a PostgreSQL built from this patch straight from Docker, with no checkout and no build:
docker run --rm -p 5432:5432 ghcr.io/hackorum-dev/postgres-patch:t53195psql -h localhost -U postgresBuilt from patchset v1 (message #1), July 27, 2026 at 04:33 AM.
Every patchset is also pushed to a branch of our PostgreSQL fork, so you can check out the same tree CI built. Without a PostgreSQL checkout:
git clone --branch t53195_1 https://github.com/hackorum-dev/postgres.gitIn a checkout you already have, add the fork once:
git remote add hackorum https://github.com/hackorum-dev/postgres.gitthen, for this patchset and every later one:
git fetch hackorum t53195_1 && git checkout t53195_1Patchset v1 (message #1) is on t53195_1
Hi Hackers,
I noticed a small grammar issue in a comment describing LP_DEAD hint
handling.
The sentence was missing the verb "is" in "whether it is safe to apply
LP_DEAD hints to the page later", which makes the comment grammatically
incorrect.
This patch fixes the comment only and does not change any behavior.
Regards,
Xiangyu Liang
