DOCS - pg_walsummary typo?
Hi.
I found what seems to be a typo in the pg_walsummary description. I
guess that "with" was supposed to say "within", but IMO just "in" is
fine.
BEFORE
These binary files are found with the pg_wal/summaries subdirectory of
the data directory...
SUGGESTION
These binary files are found in the pg_wal/summaries subdirectory of
the data directory...
PSA patch for the same.
======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia.
Attachments:
v1-0001-DOCS-pg_walsummary-fix-typo.patchapplication/octet-stream; name=v1-0001-DOCS-pg_walsummary-fix-typo.patchDownload+1-2
On Sun, Feb 15, 2026 at 10:40 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi.
I found what seems to be a typo in the pg_walsummary description. I
guess that "with" was supposed to say "within", but IMO just "in" is
fine.BEFORE
These binary files are found with the pg_wal/summaries subdirectory of
the data directory...SUGGESTION
These binary files are found in the pg_wal/summaries subdirectory of
the data directory...PSA patch for the same.
+1
Robert Treat
https://xzilla.net
On Feb 16, 2026, at 11:39, Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi.
I found what seems to be a typo in the pg_walsummary description. I
guess that "with" was supposed to say "within", but IMO just "in" is
fine.BEFORE
These binary files are found with the pg_wal/summaries subdirectory of
the data directory...SUGGESTION
These binary files are found in the pg_wal/summaries subdirectory of
the data directory...PSA patch for the same.
======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia.
<v1-0001-DOCS-pg_walsummary-fix-typo.patch>
I would guess “with” was a typo of “within”. I agree with changing “with” to “in”, alternatively, “within” and “under” may also work there.
Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/
On Mon, Feb 16, 2026 at 08:13:26AM -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
On Sun, Feb 15, 2026 at 10:40 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
I found what seems to be a typo in the pg_walsummary description. I
guess that "with" was supposed to say "within", but IMO just "in" is
fine.+1
Yep, the wording seems strange and switching this single word is an
improvement. Will fix later, if there are no objections.
--
Michael
On Mon, Mar 02, 2026 at 04:17:23PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
Yep, the wording seems strange and switching this single word is an
improvement. Will fix later, if there are no objections.
Done.
--
Michael