Open 7.1 items
I have about 20 open 7.1 items that I need to get resolved before I can
start getting the doc TODO list started. The issues relate to JDBC,
ODBC, and lots of other stuff that need to be settled before we can
finalize 7.1.
They can not be easily summarized in one line. You really have to see
the whole email to understand the issues.
How do people want to do this? I can post them to hackers, or put them
on my web site. I posted them to hackers during the past few days, but
many went unanswered. These are all relatively new from the past few
months.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
haven't seen it posted to hackers, or, if I did, I didn't clue into it ...
and just checked to see if maybe it was waiting for approval due to size,
and nothing in the queue ...
posting it here is easier to respond to ...
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
I have about 20 open 7.1 items that I need to get resolved before I can
start getting the doc TODO list started. The issues relate to JDBC,
ODBC, and lots of other stuff that need to be settled before we can
finalize 7.1.They can not be easily summarized in one line. You really have to see
the whole email to understand the issues.How do people want to do this? I can post them to hackers, or put them
on my web site. I posted them to hackers during the past few days, but
many went unanswered. These are all relatively new from the past few
months.-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
I have trickled the emails as I reviewed them, asking for comments. It
was not one big email.
haven't seen it posted to hackers, or, if I did, I didn't clue into it ...
and just checked to see if maybe it was waiting for approval due to size,
and nothing in the queue ...posting it here is easier to respond to ...
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
I have about 20 open 7.1 items that I need to get resolved before I can
start getting the doc TODO list started. The issues relate to JDBC,
ODBC, and lots of other stuff that need to be settled before we can
finalize 7.1.They can not be easily summarized in one line. You really have to see
the whole email to understand the issues.How do people want to do this? I can post them to hackers, or put them
on my web site. I posted them to hackers during the past few days, but
many went unanswered. These are all relatively new from the past few
months.-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
Bruce Momjian wrote:
I have trickled the emails as I reviewed them, asking for comments. It
was not one big email.
...
They can not be easily summarized in one line. You really have to see
the whole email to understand the issues.How do people want to do this? I can post them to hackers, or put them
on my web site. I posted them to hackers during the past few days, but
many went unanswered. These are all relatively new from the past few
months.
I guess that having _one_ document with all of them would get much more
attention.
It could be just copy and paste from the e-mails, numbered to be easily
referred to.
Not everybody here reads _every_ mail on the list, even if it is from
you ;)
---------------
Hannu
They can not be easily summarized in one line. You really have to see
the whole email to understand the issues.How do people want to do this? I can post them to hackers, or put them
on my web site. I posted them to hackers during the past few days, but
many went unanswered. These are all relatively new from the past few
months.I guess that having _one_ document with all of them would get much more
attention.It could be just copy and paste from the e-mails, numbered to be easily
referred to.Not everybody here reads _every_ mail on the list, even if it is from
you ;)
It has to be done separately because you need to see the full content
and reply to each individually. Also, they go to different lists
sometimes. Pretty confusing.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026Bruce Momjian wrote:
They can not be easily summarized in one line. You really have to see
the whole email to understand the issues.How do people want to do this? I can post them to hackers, or put them
on my web site. I posted them to hackers during the past few days, but
many went unanswered. These are all relatively new from the past few
months.I guess that having _one_ document with all of them would get much more
attention.It could be just copy and paste from the e-mails, numbered to be easily
referred to.Not everybody here reads _every_ mail on the list, even if it is from
you ;)It has to be done separately because you need to see the full content
and reply to each individually. Also, they go to different lists
sometimes. Pretty confusing.
Could you post a list of open issues where each has just a number,
heading
(optional) and link to an email in some mailing-list archive ?
----------------
Hannu
It has to be done separately because you need to see the full content
and reply to each individually. Also, they go to different lists
sometimes. Pretty confusing.Could you post a list of open issues where each has just a number,
heading
(optional) and link to an email in some mailing-list archive ?
Not really. I don't have time to make a web site out of this thing.
:-)
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
It has to be done separately because you need to see the full content
and reply to each individually. Also, they go to different lists
sometimes. Pretty confusing.Could you post a list of open issues where each has just a number,
heading
(optional) and link to an email in some mailing-list archive ?Not really. I don't have time to make a web site out of this thing.
:-)
If they were previously sent to the lists, there should be a link in the
archives to point ppl to, no? :0
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
It has to be done separately because you need to see the full content
and reply to each individually. Also, they go to different lists
sometimes. Pretty confusing.Could you post a list of open issues where each has just a number,
heading
(optional) and link to an email in some mailing-list archive ?Not really. I don't have time to make a web site out of this thing.
:-)If they were previously sent to the lists, there should be a link in the
archives to point ppl to, no? :0
Sure, but this is hard enough. Finding them is even harder. May as
well read the email rather than link to a web page.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
It has to be done separately because you need to see the full content
and reply to each individually. Also, they go to different lists
sometimes. Pretty confusing.Could you post a list of open issues where each has just a number,
heading
(optional) and link to an email in some mailing-list archive ?Not really. I don't have time to make a web site out of this thing.
:-)If they were previously sent to the lists, there should be a link in the
archives to point ppl to, no? :0Sure, but this is hard enough. Finding them is even harder.
IIRC you complained that there are 20 open issues that needed to be
resolved
befor releasing 7.1, no?
Just to start discussing them, we should need a more or less closed list
of issues.
Or was the original posting (the one that started this thread) just a
comment
about how hard life is ;) ;)
You can't reasonably expect people to read all e-mail from last few
weeks
(probably a few thousands) and spot the same items as you.
May as well read the email rather than link to a web page.
Still it would be good to have a "TODO before 7.1 relese"
-------------
Hannu
You can't reasonably expect people to read all e-mail from last few
weeks
(probably a few thousands) and spot the same items as you.May as well read the email rather than link to a web page.
Still it would be good to have a "TODO before 7.1 relese"
I send each article to the appropriate list with a comment at the top
asking for assistance. I can't boild down many of these items into
short descriptions. People need to see the detail of the emails.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026Bruce Momjian wrote:
You can't reasonably expect people to read all e-mail from last few
weeks
(probably a few thousands) and spot the same items as you.May as well read the email rather than link to a web page.
Still it would be good to have a "TODO before 7.1 relese"
I send each article to the appropriate list with a comment at the top
asking for assistance. I can't boild down many of these items into
short descriptions. People need to see the detail of the emails.
But maybe we could agree on something in Subject:, maybe [TODO - 7.1]
so that it is immediately clear it's urgent ?
-------------
Hannu
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Hannu Krosing wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
You can't reasonably expect people to read all e-mail from last few
weeks
(probably a few thousands) and spot the same items as you.May as well read the email rather than link to a web page.
Still it would be good to have a "TODO before 7.1 relese"
I send each article to the appropriate list with a comment at the top
asking for assistance. I can't boild down many of these items into
short descriptions. People need to see the detail of the emails.But maybe we could agree on something in Subject:, maybe [TODO - 7.1]
so that it is immediately clear it's urgent ?
Sounds reasonable to me ...
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Hannu Krosing wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
You can't reasonably expect people to read all e-mail from last few
weeks
(probably a few thousands) and spot the same items as you.May as well read the email rather than link to a web page.
Still it would be good to have a "TODO before 7.1 relese"
I send each article to the appropriate list with a comment at the top
asking for assistance. I can't boild down many of these items into
short descriptions. People need to see the detail of the emails.But maybe we could agree on something in Subject:, maybe [TODO - 7.1]
so that it is immediately clear it's urgent ?Sounds reasonable to me ...
Great idea.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
Quoting Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>:
I have trickled the emails as I reviewed them, asking for comments. It
was not one big email.
I haven't seen them either, although my Inbox is big again, and I'm filtering
out mails by their subject line, so it's possible I've missed them.
I'm slowly working my way through JDBC, but it's all hinging on getting my
linux box back online. It's powered up, but not talking to the network :-(
Should be sorted by Saturday morning...
Peter
haven't seen it posted to hackers, or, if I did, I didn't clue into it
...
and just checked to see if maybe it was waiting for approval due to
size,
and nothing in the queue ...
posting it here is easier to respond to ...
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
I have about 20 open 7.1 items that I need to get resolved before I
can
start getting the doc TODO list started. The issues relate to
JDBC,
ODBC, and lots of other stuff that need to be settled before we can
finalize 7.1.They can not be easily summarized in one line. You really have to
see
the whole email to understand the issues.
How do people want to do this? I can post them to hackers, or put
them
on my web site. I posted them to hackers during the past few days,
but
many went unanswered. These are all relatively new from the past
few
months.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick:
Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary:scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
--
Peter Mount peter@retep.org.uk
PostgreSQL JDBC Driver: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres/
RetepPDF PDF library for Java: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf/