Returned due to virus; was:Status
�-�3�ً�)$Tݗ�K��$O��O׻�r9
xGlQ�˄��N�}*�`�<K�7��b�¡#FQ3������v�"H�]�)x�
�:�̄{��?��v��
v����`%�V :Y���WKl9E�7[T�g�2��)���BN_�w#���.�s�{oF5��.4pÌ‘We�eח�E%J�N�i���'}m.Fe�����5�S�HM��2�&w.a���OhE�6����.�]x)([G�I�_�?��(51��#�BӲ�è£�P �Sgi���p�fS���^T�/���s��Q�AÏ ï¿½>����($��gnt˱��̲���>��E�_�r�w��ֵ�Ö�����c]��a�5zY�_:�8`�"F,�1��[4���!}�6��6����w��|3�B��;���#�_P����l0��(U��
5b�g�:����5|�9-dB�0��*��z���ߒ��H�ۺ4IJ���Q������?� x�w{�~
.ֹ��)�cE����;�#\�]����<���Z��4�WO�y�ۻ-Q�$f�er��j*ޑ��ŲzA5����E>���
�٤��K�:�:i���ٜE
�7��\!�����ś��pL��AӞr�
Vs�.��)GgQ
�0�Y}��#��,N<yÔZo�>\d9�Ib�>m�g�X�zl���˗�%��qE��X!�-�����,,E��X^T(�J߹�s��d��&g�TEqq~sPa�vY�`%���_&�(����B�j~�]×�:�q9���]���:M�#L�{ŷ�F�_��A�e�GG6��O�/�mV�6Ob4��d�g��/���'X?ߣ��9%��-�U��é¤ä›�7K[t�*&.�ι^M�k������G�t
����6�
�~c!�Y�w�C囕�I�A���ݡjѿ�8���u�ȣ�ݶt��wW��)Uv��_��ט}q��P����v}��O����h�d\���qt�Wɕ�֧j ���8���.�(7�؇�|Ȇ�Ѽ���S{l��KT�y;t9ͫ#d;�J�
�Úd5��<ݿ�I��D�h��|Ö��o����G4��8���5Bx�� H���Li�HÃ¥`
�`�p���}ƆᎾ��j����O��Z$k���?�歹���ևjߛډ�4��>���rԚ�av��B Կ7g2?�<��C�ii�8
8��}j���L]�DE�w�H���2 �Y�?���-w�J��1Qb���vYCe�;�L�����?)ף��ZY_�i"%R;��ҙ}k�d�[�*l鎣Iw���?Q|�*�d%�M��[�*�Z��A�>�2&>����X
Attachments:
text.zip.htmtext/html; name=text.zip.htmDownload
EXISTS and IN seem to work ok for:
dynacom=# SELECT count(*) from parts p where p.id in (select md.partid
from machdefs md);
count
-------
12656
(1 row)
dynacom=# SELECT count(*) from parts p where exists (select 1 from
machdefs md where md.partid = p.id);
count
-------
12656
(1 row)
Whereas IN seems to not working ok when negated as shown below:
dynacom=# SELECT count(*) from parts p where p.id not in (select md.partid
from machdefs md);
count
-------
0
(1 row)
dynacom=# SELECT count(*) from parts p where not exists (select 1 from
machdefs md where md.partid = p.id);
count
-------
291
(1 row)
dynacom=# SELECT version();
version
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PostgreSQL 7.4.1 on i386-unknown-freebsd5.1, compiled by GCC gcc (GCC)
3.2.2 [FreeBSD] 20030205 (release)
(1 row)
On PostgreSQL 7.4.1 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC 2.96, i get
identical results.
Is this a known issue? Addressed before?
--
-Achilleus
Achilleus Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> writes:
Whereas IN seems to not working ok when negated as shown below:
If the sub-select returns any NULLs then this behavior is per SQL spec.
regards, tom lane
O kyrios Tom Lane egrapse stis Feb 5, 2004 :
Achilleus Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> writes:
Whereas IN seems to not working ok when negated as shown below:
If the sub-select returns any NULLs then this behavior is per SQL spec.
Thanx a lot!
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
--
-Achilleus