BUG #1238: postgres option -Q used in src/test/bench
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 1238
Logged by: A Wu
Email address: sunwukong@ieee.org
PostgreSQL version: 8.0 Beta
Operating system: Linux 2.6.7-gentoo-r14 x86_64
Description: postgres option -Q used in src/test/bench
Details:
src/test/bench/create.sh and src/test/bench/runwisc.sh both invoke
"postgres" with a -Q option which is not supported in 8.0 Beta1. Deleting -Q
from both files allows the scripts to run to completion.
"PostgreSQL Bugs List" <pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org> writes:
src/test/bench/create.sh and src/test/bench/runwisc.sh both invoke
"postgres" with a -Q option which is not supported in 8.0 Beta1.
These scripts really need to be thrown away or rewritten entirely.
Benchmarks against a standalone backend are not interesting in the real
world. I doubt anyone has tried to run these in the past five years...
regards, tom lane
I removed the -Q mention in the comments but Tom already fixed this in
early September.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PostgreSQL Bugs List wrote:
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 1238
Logged by: A WuEmail address: sunwukong@ieee.org
PostgreSQL version: 8.0 Beta
Operating system: Linux 2.6.7-gentoo-r14 x86_64
Description: postgres option -Q used in src/test/bench
Details:
src/test/bench/create.sh and src/test/bench/runwisc.sh both invoke
"postgres" with a -Q option which is not supported in 8.0 Beta1. Deleting -Q
from both files allows the scripts to run to completion.---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
I removed the -Q mention in the comments but Tom already fixed this in
early September.
Actually, I deliberately left that comment alone, since it appeared to
me to be a statement of historical fact --- ie, that *was* what they did
for some now-forgotten paper --- not a recommendation of how to do
things now. It's a judgment call though.
regards, tom lane
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
I removed the -Q mention in the comments but Tom already fixed this in
early September.Actually, I deliberately left that comment alone, since it appeared to
me to be a statement of historical fact --- ie, that *was* what they did
for some now-forgotten paper --- not a recommendation of how to do
things now. It's a judgment call though.
Yea, I just remove the entire comment. It is just too long to be
relevant, no?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073