Out-of-Memory with ROWTYPE assignment in PL/pgSQL FOR loop

Started by Bill Rugolsky Jr.almost 21 years ago3 messagesbugs
Jump to latest
#1Bill Rugolsky Jr.
brugolsky@telemetry-investments.com

Hello,

The PL/pgSQL FOR loop in the function consume_memory() defined below
will consume VM on each iteration until the process hits its ulimit.
The problem occurs with variables of ROWTYPE; there is no unbounded
allocation when using simple types such as integer or varchar. Before I
delve into the SPI code, perhaps someone familiar with PostgreSQL internals
can spot the resource leak.

Tested with 8.0.1 and CVS head as of 2005-06-20:

-- Start of test code

-- create a table with ten million rows
CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE ten ( n integer DEFAULT 0 ) ;
INSERT INTO ten VALUES (0);
INSERT INTO ten VALUES (1);
INSERT INTO ten VALUES (2);
INSERT INTO ten VALUES (3);
INSERT INTO ten VALUES (4);
INSERT INTO ten VALUES (5);
INSERT INTO ten VALUES (6);
INSERT INTO ten VALUES (7);
INSERT INTO ten VALUES (8);
INSERT INTO ten VALUES (9);
CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE thousand AS
SELECT 100*i.n + 10*j.n + k.n AS n FROM ten AS i, ten as j, ten as k ;
CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE tenmillion AS
SELECT 10000*i.n + 10*j.n + k.n AS n FROM thousand AS i, thousand as j, ten as k ;

-- a function to consume memory
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION consume_memory()
RETURNS void AS $PROC$
DECLARE
rec tenmillion%ROWTYPE ;
prev tenmillion%ROWTYPE ;
BEGIN
FOR rec IN SELECT * FROM tenmillion LOOP
prev := rec ;
END LOOP ;
RETURN ;
END
$PROC$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;

-- Until this point, memory usage is approximately constant.
-- Evaluating the above function will rapidly consume VM.

SELECT consume_memory() ;

-- End of test code

Here's a record of Committed_AS from /proc/meminfo on a Linux 2.6 system,
over the course of the test:

rugolsky@ti64: while : ; do grep Committed_AS /proc/meminfo ; sleep 1 ; done
Committed_AS: 225592 kB
Committed_AS: 225592 kB
Committed_AS: 233692 kB <- Started
Committed_AS: 258280 kB
Committed_AS: 282868 kB
Committed_AS: 299260 kB
Committed_AS: 323848 kB
Committed_AS: 340232 kB
Committed_AS: 348436 kB
Committed_AS: 356632 kB
Committed_AS: 381220 kB
Committed_AS: 397612 kB
Committed_AS: 414004 kB
Committed_AS: 422200 kB
Committed_AS: 438592 kB
Committed_AS: 463180 kB
Committed_AS: 487768 kB
Committed_AS: 504160 kB
Committed_AS: 504160 kB
Committed_AS: 520552 kB
Committed_AS: 545140 kB
Committed_AS: 569728 kB
Committed_AS: 586120 kB
Committed_AS: 586120 kB
Committed_AS: 602512 kB
Committed_AS: 225640 kB <- Cancelled

Regards,

Bill Rugolsky

#2Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: Bill Rugolsky Jr. (#1)
Re: Out-of-Memory with ROWTYPE assignment in PL/pgSQL FOR loop

"Bill Rugolsky Jr." <brugolsky@telemetry-investments.com> writes:

The PL/pgSQL FOR loop in the function consume_memory() defined below
will consume VM on each iteration until the process hits its ulimit.
The problem occurs with variables of ROWTYPE; there is no unbounded
allocation when using simple types such as integer or varchar.

Yeah, looks like I introduced a memory leak with the 8.0 changes for
better support of rowtype variables :-(. Here's the patch.

regards, tom lane

Index: pl_exec.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/pl/plpgsql/src/pl_exec.c,v
retrieving revision 1.127.4.2
diff -c -r1.127.4.2 pl_exec.c
*** pl_exec.c	20 Jun 2005 20:44:50 -0000	1.127.4.2
--- pl_exec.c	20 Jun 2005 22:46:14 -0000
***************
*** 2003,2013 ****
  	estate->eval_tuptable = NULL;
  	estate->eval_processed = 0;
  	estate->eval_lastoid = InvalidOid;
- 	estate->eval_econtext = NULL;

estate->err_func = func;
estate->err_stmt = NULL;
estate->err_text = NULL;
}

  /* ----------
--- 2003,2032 ----
  	estate->eval_tuptable = NULL;
  	estate->eval_processed = 0;
  	estate->eval_lastoid = InvalidOid;
  	estate->err_func = func;
  	estate->err_stmt = NULL;
  	estate->err_text = NULL;
+ 
+ 	/*
+ 	 * Create an EState for evaluation of simple expressions, if there's
+ 	 * not one already in the current transaction.	The EState is made a
+ 	 * child of TopTransactionContext so it will have the right lifespan.
+ 	 */
+ 	if (simple_eval_estate == NULL)
+ 	{
+ 		MemoryContext oldcontext;
+ 
+ 		oldcontext = MemoryContextSwitchTo(TopTransactionContext);
+ 		simple_eval_estate = CreateExecutorState();
+ 		MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldcontext);
+ 	}
+ 
+ 	/*
+ 	 * Create an expression context for simple expressions.
+ 	 * This must be a child of simple_eval_estate.
+ 	 */
+ 	estate->eval_econtext = CreateExprContext(simple_eval_estate);
  }
  /* ----------
***************
*** 3238,3243 ****
--- 3257,3264 ----
  				Datum *value,
  				bool *isnull)
  {
+ 	MemoryContext oldcontext;
+ 
  	switch (datum->dtype)
  	{
  		case PLPGSQL_DTYPE_VAR:
***************
*** 3264,3272 ****
--- 3285,3295 ----
  					elog(ERROR, "row variable has no tupdesc");
  				/* Make sure we have a valid type/typmod setting */
  				BlessTupleDesc(row->rowtupdesc);
+ 				oldcontext = MemoryContextSwitchTo(estate->eval_econtext->ecxt_per_tuple_memory);
  				tup = make_tuple_from_row(estate, row, row->rowtupdesc);
  				if (tup == NULL)	/* should not happen */
  					elog(ERROR, "row not compatible with its own tupdesc");
+ 				MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldcontext);
  				*typeid = row->rowtupdesc->tdtypeid;
  				*value = HeapTupleGetDatum(tup);
  				*isnull = false;
***************
*** 3299,3308 ****
--- 3322,3333 ----
  				 * fields. Copy the tuple body and insert the right
  				 * values.
  				 */
+ 				oldcontext = MemoryContextSwitchTo(estate->eval_econtext->ecxt_per_tuple_memory);
  				heap_copytuple_with_tuple(rec->tup, &worktup);
  				HeapTupleHeaderSetDatumLength(worktup.t_data, worktup.t_len);
  				HeapTupleHeaderSetTypeId(worktup.t_data, rec->tupdesc->tdtypeid);
  				HeapTupleHeaderSetTypMod(worktup.t_data, rec->tupdesc->tdtypmod);
+ 				MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldcontext);
  				*typeid = rec->tupdesc->tdtypeid;
  				*value = HeapTupleGetDatum(&worktup);
  				*isnull = false;
***************
*** 3579,3585 ****
  					  Oid *rettype)
  {
  	Datum		retval;
! 	ExprContext * volatile econtext;
  	ParamListInfo paramLI;
  	int			i;
  	Snapshot	saveActiveSnapshot;
--- 3604,3610 ----
  					  Oid *rettype)
  {
  	Datum		retval;
! 	ExprContext *econtext = estate->eval_econtext;
  	ParamListInfo paramLI;
  	int			i;
  	Snapshot	saveActiveSnapshot;
***************
*** 3590,3609 ****
  	*rettype = expr->expr_simple_type;
  	/*
- 	 * Create an EState for evaluation of simple expressions, if there's
- 	 * not one already in the current transaction.	The EState is made a
- 	 * child of TopTransactionContext so it will have the right lifespan.
- 	 */
- 	if (simple_eval_estate == NULL)
- 	{
- 		MemoryContext oldcontext;
- 
- 		oldcontext = MemoryContextSwitchTo(TopTransactionContext);
- 		simple_eval_estate = CreateExecutorState();
- 		MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldcontext);
- 	}
- 
- 	/*
  	 * Prepare the expression for execution, if it's not been done already
  	 * in the current transaction.
  	 */
--- 3615,3620 ----
***************
*** 3617,3634 ****
  	}
  	/*
- 	 * Create an expression context for simple expressions, if there's not
- 	 * one already in the current function call.  This must be a child of
- 	 * simple_eval_estate.
- 	 */
- 	econtext = estate->eval_econtext;
- 	if (econtext == NULL)
- 	{
- 		econtext = CreateExprContext(simple_eval_estate);
- 		estate->eval_econtext = econtext;
- 	}
- 
- 	/*
  	 * Param list can live in econtext's temporary memory context.
  	 *
  	 * XXX think about avoiding repeated palloc's for param lists? Beware
--- 3628,3633 ----
#3Bill Rugolsky Jr.
brugolsky@telemetry-investments.com
In reply to: Tom Lane (#2)
Re: Out-of-Memory with ROWTYPE assignment in PL/pgSQL FOR loop

On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 06:54:20PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

"Bill Rugolsky Jr." <brugolsky@telemetry-investments.com> writes:

The PL/pgSQL FOR loop in the function consume_memory() defined below
will consume VM on each iteration until the process hits its ulimit.
The problem occurs with variables of ROWTYPE; there is no unbounded
allocation when using simple types such as integer or varchar.

Yeah, looks like I introduced a memory leak with the 8.0 changes for
better support of rowtype variables :-(. Here's the patch.

Thank you for the quick reply; much appreciated!
Applied and tested against CVS head; that plugged the leak.

-Bill