ECPG Preprocessor throws Syntax Error [Devel Repository]
Hi,
Yesterday I pull source from PG-Devel repository (Head) and was playing
around with ECPG. I got following two issues while parsing my script files
through ECPG preprocessor which I think are potential bugs;
1- I get this error message from preprocessor,
*ERROR: cursor "m_name_cursor" already defined *
Below is the code snippet, error message is thrown on the last line of this
snippet;
...
...
EXEC SQL DECLARE m_name_cursor CURSOR FOR SELECT name,id FROM m_table3;
EXEC SQL OPEN m_name_cursor;
EXEC SQL CLOSE m_name_cursor;
/* Declaring cursor with the same name */
EXEC SQL DECLARE m_name_cursor CURSOR FOR SELECT name,id FROM m_table4;
2- Preprocessor throws this error;
*ERROR: syntax error at or near "-"*
Below is the code snippet, the error is thrown on the last line of the
snippet;
...
...
const char *stmt1 = "SELECT abs(?)";
EXEC SQL PREPARE mystmt1 FROM :stmt1;
EXEC SQL EXECUTE mystmt1 INTO :result USING -.55566;
Regards,
Ahmed
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:09:40PM +0500, Ahmed Shinwari wrote:
through ECPG preprocessor which I think are potential bugs;
1- I get this error message from preprocessor,
*ERROR: cursor "m_name_cursor" already defined *
Below is the code snippet, error message is thrown on the last line of this
snippet;EXEC SQL DECLARE m_name_cursor CURSOR FOR SELECT name,id FROM m_table3;
EXEC SQL OPEN m_name_cursor;
EXEC SQL CLOSE m_name_cursor;/* Declaring cursor with the same name */
EXEC SQL DECLARE m_name_cursor CURSOR FOR SELECT name,id FROM m_table4;
I might be missing something here, but where do you see the bug? The cursor is
indeed already defined.
2- Preprocessor throws this error;
*ERROR: syntax error at or near "-"*
...
Fixed in CVS. Thanks for the report.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes@jabber.org
Go VfL Borussia! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
I might be missing something here, but where do you see the bug? The cursor is
indeed already defined.
What i understand here is,we should be able to DECLARE cursor again
with the same name if that is CLOSE already.
--- On Fri, 12/12/08, Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org> wrote:
From: Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [BUGS] ECPG Preprocessor throws Syntax Error [Devel Repository]
To: "Ahmed Shinwari" <ahmed.shibwari@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
Date: Friday, December 12, 2008, 4:26 AM
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:09:40PM +0500, Ahmed Shinwari wrote:
through ECPG preprocessor which I think are potential bugs;
1- I get this error message from preprocessor,
*ERROR: cursor "m_name_cursor" already defined *
Below is the code snippet, error message is thrown on the last line of
this
snippet;
EXEC SQL DECLARE m_name_cursor CURSOR FOR SELECT name,id FROM m_table3;
EXEC SQL OPEN m_name_cursor;
EXEC SQL CLOSE m_name_cursor;/* Declaring cursor with the same name */
EXEC SQL DECLARE m_name_cursor CURSOR FOR SELECT name,id FROM m_table4;
I might be missing something here, but where do you see the bug? The cursor is
indeed already defined.
2- Preprocessor throws this error;
*ERROR: syntax error at or near "-"*
...
Fixed in CVS. Thanks for the report.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes@jabber.org
Go VfL Borussia! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
Zahid Khan <khanzahid235@yahoo.com> writes:
I might be missing something here, but where do you see the bug? The cursor is
indeed already defined.
What i understand here is,we should be able to DECLARE cursor again
with the same name if that is CLOSE already.
No, CLOSE reverses the effect of OPEN, not of DECLARE.
regards, tom lane