BUG #4674: Unable to open lob

Started by 田中 裕一about 17 years ago3 messagesbugs
Jump to latest
#1田中 裕一
yuichi_tanaka@cybozu.co.jp

The following bug has been logged online:

Bug reference: 4674
Logged by: Yuichi Tanaka
Email address: yuichi_tanaka@cybozu.co.jp
PostgreSQL version: 8.3.6
Operating system: Linux
Description: Unable to open lob
Details:

I wrote the code like below:

// open lob
if( (pgsql_lofd1 = lo_open(pgsql, oid, pgsql_mode)) == -1 ) {
printf("error: first lo_open\n");
}

// send query asynchronously
PQsendQuery(pgsql, "INSERT INTO bar (name) VALUES ('aaa');" );

// open lob
if( (pgsql_lofd2 = lo_open(pgsql, oid+1, pgsql_mode)) == -1 ) {
printf("error: second lo_open\n");
}

This program displays "error: second lo_open".
Is this a bug or correct behavior?

#2Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: 田中 裕一 (#1)
Re: BUG #4674: Unable to open lob

"Yuichi Tanaka" <yuichi_tanaka@cybozu.co.jp> writes:

This program displays "error: second lo_open".

Where did you get the oid value from? What makes you think that one
more than that oid is also a large object?

regards, tom lane

#3田中 裕一
yuichi_tanaka@cybozu.co.jp
In reply to: Tom Lane (#2)
Re: BUG #4674: Unable to open lob

I'm sorry, that code is a test code, and oid value is written directly in the code.
I'm sure there are large objects whose id is oid and oid+1.

In fact, if I get rid of PQsendQuery statement, I can open the two large
objects because that code displays nothing.

In my survey, if I execute PQsendQuery between two lo_open,
the latter lo_open returns -1.
And this situation continues until the connection is disconnected.

Best regards.

Tom Lane wrote:

"Yuichi Tanaka" <yuichi_tanaka@cybozu.co.jp> writes:

This program displays "error: second lo_open".

Where did you get the oid value from? What makes you think that one
more than that oid is also a large object?

regards, tom lane

----
Yuichi Tanaka (yuichi_tanaka@cybozu.co.jp)