shouldn't "create unique index concurrently on x (i)" raise error?

Started by hubert depesz lubaczewskiover 16 years ago2 messagesbugs

hubert depesz lubaczewski

depesz@depesz.com

over 16 years ago

well, the question is in subject.

basically - shouldn't this command raise error instead of creating index
named "concurrently"?

depesz

--
Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/depesz / blog: http://www.depesz.com/
jid/gtalk: depesz@depesz.com / aim:depeszhdl / skype:depesz_hdl / gg:6749007

tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us

over 16 years ago

In reply to: hubert depesz lubaczewski (#1)

Re: shouldn't "create unique index concurrently on x (i)" raise error?

hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com> writes:

basically - shouldn't this command raise error instead of creating index
named "concurrently"?

No. That would mean that "concurrently" is a reserved word.

regards, tom lane