Setting timezone: is it bug or intended?
postgres=# set timezone='+03';
SET
postgres=# select now();
now
-------------------------------
2011-03-18 11:20:29.696671+03
(1 row)
postgres=# set timezone='+03:00';
SET
postgres=# select now();
now
------------------------------
2011-03-18 05:20:35.46008-03
(1 row)
(checked with 8.4 and 9.0)
Hello Yora Sokolov,
On 18.03.2011 09:22, Yura Sokolov wrote:
postgres=# set timezone='+03:00';
SET
postgres=# select now();
now
------------------------------
2011-03-18 05:20:35.46008-03
(1 row)
Maybe this is not a bug - just an inconsistence:
Look here (tested with 9.0):
=# set timezone='+3.5';
SET
=# select current_timestamp;
now
----------------------------------
2011-03-21 16:05:34.761112+03:30
(1 row)
In any case, this should get documented.
Susanne
--
Susanne Ebrecht - 2ndQuadrant
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
www.2ndQuadrant.com
21.03.2011 15:51, Susanne Ebrecht пїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅ:
Hello Yora Sokolov,
Maybe this is not a bug - just an inconsistence:
Look here (tested with 9.0):
=# set timezone='+3.5';
SET
=# select current_timestamp;
now
----------------------------------
2011-03-21 16:05:34.761112+03:30
(1 row)In any case, this should get documented.
Susanne
My question were about sign of timezone:
postgres=# set timezone='+03'; -- positive
postgres=# select now();
2011-03-18 11:20:29.696671+03 -- positive
postgres=# set timezone='+03:00'; -- positive
2011-03-18 05:20:35.46008-03 -- negative
Is it intended?
Yura Sokolov
Yura Sokolov wrote:
21.03.2011 15:51, Susanne Ebrecht ?????:
Hello Yora Sokolov,
Maybe this is not a bug - just an inconsistence:
Look here (tested with 9.0):
=# set timezone='+3.5';
SET
=# select current_timestamp;
now
----------------------------------
2011-03-21 16:05:34.761112+03:30
(1 row)In any case, this should get documented.
Susanne
My question were about sign of timezone:
postgres=# set timezone='+03'; -- positive
postgres=# select now();
2011-03-18 11:20:29.696671+03 -- positive
postgres=# set timezone='+03:00'; -- positive
2011-03-18 05:20:35.46008-03 -- negativeIs it intended?
Uh, it certainly looks very odd. What I believe is happening is that
+03:00 is processed as a real time zone specification:
test=> set timezone='+03:00';
SET
test=> show timezone;
TimeZone
----------
--> +03:00
(1 row)
test=> select now();
now
-------------------------------
2011-04-26 15:41:11.409237-03
(1 row)
You will notice that because of the SQL standard, GMT+3 processes as -03
utc_offset, and '+03:00' must be processed the same:
test=> select * from pg_timezone_names;
name | abbrev | utc_offset | is_dst
----------------------------------+--------+------------+--------
...
Etc/GMT+3 | GMT+3 | -03:00:00 | f
The '+03' is seen as hours-minutes-seconds:
test=> set timezone='+03';
SET
test=> show timezone;
TimeZone
----------
--> 03:00:00
(1 row)
test=> select now();
now
-------------------------------
2011-04-26 21:40:57.570654+03
(1 row)
hence the +03. Notice how different that looks from the +03:00 above.
As far as how to even document this, I have no idea. I think this code
is being processed by the timezone library we include as part of Postgres.
I am lost on how to proceed.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
As far as how to even document this, I have no idea.
It already is documented. See
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/datatype-datetime.html#DATATYPE-TIMEZONES
specifically the point that POSIX zone names have the opposite sign
convention from ISO-8601.
The great thing about standards is there are so many to choose from ;-)
regards, tom lane
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
As far as how to even document this, I have no idea.
It already is documented. See
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/datatype-datetime.html#DATATYPE-TIMEZONES
specifically the point that POSIX zone names have the opposite sign
convention from ISO-8601.The great thing about standards is there are so many to choose from ;-)
What isn't documented is why the sign changes for +0300 but not +03:
test=> set timezone='+03:00';
SET
test=> select now();
now
-------------------------------
2011-04-26 18:22:55.571638-03
(1 row)
test=> set timezone='+03';
SET
test=> select now();
now
-------------------------------
2011-04-27 00:23:00.627179+03
(1 row)
It is the colon somehow:
test=> set timezone='+03:';
ERROR: invalid value for parameter "TimeZone": "+03:"
test=> select now();
now
-------------------------------
2011-04-26 18:24:36.921323-03
(1 row)
test=> set timezone='+03:0';
SET
test=> select now();
now
------------------------------
2011-04-26 18:25:09.88588-03
(1 row)
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
It already is documented. See
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/datatype-datetime.html#DATATYPE-TIMEZONES
specifically the point that POSIX zone names have the opposite sign
convention from ISO-8601.The great thing about standards is there are so many to choose from ;-)
What isn't documented is why the sign changes for +0300 but not +03:
+03:00 is a legal POSIX zone name (hence the sign is different from SQL
convention). The other one is evidently being handled by this code path
in check_timezone:
/*
* Try it as a numeric number of hours (possibly fractional).
*/
hours = strtod(*newval, &endptr);
if (endptr != *newval && *endptr == '\0')
{
/* Here we change from SQL to Unix sign convention */
myextra.CTimeZone = -hours * SECS_PER_HOUR;
myextra.HasCTZSet = true;
}
which I think is legacy code meant to deal with SQL-standard
specification of timezone offsets as INTERVAL values. You get the same
interpretation of sign when you use the SQL-spec syntax:
regression=# set time zone interval '+03:00';
SET
regression=# select now();
now
-------------------------------
2011-04-27 00:44:53.560295+03
(1 row)
Like I said, too many standards with their fingers in this pie.
regards, tom lane
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
It already is documented. See
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/datatype-datetime.html#DATATYPE-TIMEZONES
specifically the point that POSIX zone names have the opposite sign
convention from ISO-8601.The great thing about standards is there are so many to choose from ;-)
What isn't documented is why the sign changes for +0300 but not +03:
+03:00 is a legal POSIX zone name (hence the sign is different from SQL
convention). The other one is evidently being handled by this code path
in check_timezone:/*
* Try it as a numeric number of hours (possibly fractional).
*/
hours = strtod(*newval, &endptr);
if (endptr != *newval && *endptr == '\0')
{
/* Here we change from SQL to Unix sign convention */
myextra.CTimeZone = -hours * SECS_PER_HOUR;
myextra.HasCTZSet = true;
}which I think is legacy code meant to deal with SQL-standard
specification of timezone offsets as INTERVAL values. You get the same
interpretation of sign when you use the SQL-spec syntax:regression=# set time zone interval '+03:00';
SET
regression=# select now();
now
-------------------------------
2011-04-27 00:44:53.560295+03
(1 row)Like I said, too many standards with their fingers in this pie.
I assume we decided we can't improve this.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +