Changes needed to build on NetBSD

Started by Nonameover 24 years ago5 messages
#1Noname
darcy@druid.net

A fellow NetBSD developer has sent me some changes needed to build 7.1
cleanly on NetBSD through its package system. I am asking him a few
questions about it but I thought I would just commit them then if no one
has a problem. They are mostly related to building cleanly on NetBSD.
Perhaps someone could watch source changes and just review the changes.
I am asking because I generally don't work on stuff outside of PyGreSQL.

-- 
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@{druid|vex}.net>   |  Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/                |  and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212     (DoD#0082)    (eNTP)   |  what's for dinner.
#2Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: Noname (#1)
Re: Changes needed to build on NetBSD

darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain) writes:

A fellow NetBSD developer has sent me some changes needed to build 7.1
cleanly on NetBSD through its package system. I am asking him a few
questions about it but I thought I would just commit them then if no one
has a problem. They are mostly related to building cleanly on NetBSD.
Perhaps someone could watch source changes and just review the changes.
I am asking because I generally don't work on stuff outside of PyGreSQL.

If you're not sure of them, I suggest posting the diffs on -patches
rather than committing them yourself.

regards, tom lane

#3Peter Eisentraut
peter_e@gmx.net
In reply to: Noname (#1)
Re: Changes needed to build on NetBSD

D'Arcy J.M. Cain writes:

A fellow NetBSD developer has sent me some changes needed to build 7.1
cleanly on NetBSD through its package system. I am asking him a few
questions about it but I thought I would just commit them then if no one
has a problem. They are mostly related to building cleanly on NetBSD.

Given that we had several successful reports for NetBSD for the 7.1
release I am suspicious about the definition of "clean". Changes required
for binary(?) packaging generally do not count as bug fixes. At least I'd
like to see a description of the problems first.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter

#4Bruce Momjian
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us
In reply to: Noname (#1)
Re: Changes needed to build on NetBSD

If the changes relate only to NetBSD-specific parts of the code, I
usually apply the patch it if looks OK. Shoot it to patches and we can
give it a quick review.

A fellow NetBSD developer has sent me some changes needed to build 7.1
cleanly on NetBSD through its package system. I am asking him a few
questions about it but I thought I would just commit them then if no one
has a problem. They are mostly related to building cleanly on NetBSD.
Perhaps someone could watch source changes and just review the changes.
I am asking because I generally don't work on stuff outside of PyGreSQL.

-- 
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@{druid|vex}.net>   |  Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/                |  and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212     (DoD#0082)    (eNTP)   |  what's for dinner.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
#5Noname
darcy@druid.net
In reply to: Peter Eisentraut (#3)
Re: Changes needed to build on NetBSD

Thus spake Peter Eisentraut

D'Arcy J.M. Cain writes:

A fellow NetBSD developer has sent me some changes needed to build 7.1
cleanly on NetBSD through its package system. I am asking him a few
questions about it but I thought I would just commit them then if no one
has a problem. They are mostly related to building cleanly on NetBSD.

Given that we had several successful reports for NetBSD for the 7.1
release I am suspicious about the definition of "clean". Changes required
for binary(?) packaging generally do not count as bug fixes. At least I'd
like to see a description of the problems first.

Note the reference to "through its package system" above. The package
builds fine on NetBSD. This is just to make it easier to build it in
the more automated way that the package system does.

Anyway, I have sent the patches to the patches mailing list.

-- 
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@{druid|vex}.net>   |  Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/                |  and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212     (DoD#0082)    (eNTP)   |  what's for dinner.