BUG #9046: vacuum analyze fails on a table that has domain that is a date rage

Started by Regina Obeabout 12 years ago3 messagesbugs
Jump to latest
#1Regina Obe
lr@pcorp.us

The following bug has been logged on the website:

Bug reference: 9046
Logged by: Regina Obe
Email address: lr@pcorp.us
PostgreSQL version: 9.3.2
Operating system: Windows 2003 x 64 PostgreSQL x 64
Description:

Here are steps to recreate:

CREATE DOMAIN domain_period
AS daterange
DEFAULT daterange('-infinity'::date, 'infinity'::date, '[)'::text)
NOT NULL
CONSTRAINT domain_period_check_1 CHECK (lower(VALUE) < upper(VALUE))
CONSTRAINT domain_period_check_2 CHECK (NOT isempty(VALUE))
CONSTRAINT domain_period_check_3 CHECK (lower_inc(VALUE))
CONSTRAINT domain_period_check_4 CHECK (NOT upper_inc(VALUE));

CREATE TABLE test_domain_period(id serial, period domain_period);

vacuum analyze test_domain_period;

Get error:
ERROR: type 920283 is not a range type

--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

#2Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: Regina Obe (#1)
Re: BUG #9046: vacuum analyze fails on a table that has domain that is a date rage

lr@pcorp.us writes:

Here are steps to recreate:

CREATE DOMAIN domain_period
AS daterange
DEFAULT daterange('-infinity'::date, 'infinity'::date, '[)'::text)
NOT NULL
CONSTRAINT domain_period_check_1 CHECK (lower(VALUE) < upper(VALUE))
CONSTRAINT domain_period_check_2 CHECK (NOT isempty(VALUE))
CONSTRAINT domain_period_check_3 CHECK (lower_inc(VALUE))
CONSTRAINT domain_period_check_4 CHECK (NOT upper_inc(VALUE));

CREATE TABLE test_domain_period(id serial, period domain_period);

vacuum analyze test_domain_period;

Works for me in git head. I think this is the same problem reported
in bug #8684, and fixed at commit 663f8419b.

regards, tom lane

--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

#3Bruce Momjian
bruce@momjian.us
In reply to: Regina Obe (#1)
Re: BUG #9046: vacuum analyze fails on a table that has domain that is a date rage

On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 12:31:59AM +0000, lr@pcorp.us wrote:

The following bug has been logged on the website:

Bug reference: 9046
Logged by: Regina Obe
Email address: lr@pcorp.us
PostgreSQL version: 9.3.2
Operating system: Windows 2003 x 64 PostgreSQL x 64
Description:

Here are steps to recreate:

CREATE DOMAIN domain_period
AS daterange
DEFAULT daterange('-infinity'::date, 'infinity'::date, '[)'::text)
NOT NULL
CONSTRAINT domain_period_check_1 CHECK (lower(VALUE) < upper(VALUE))
CONSTRAINT domain_period_check_2 CHECK (NOT isempty(VALUE))
CONSTRAINT domain_period_check_3 CHECK (lower_inc(VALUE))
CONSTRAINT domain_period_check_4 CHECK (NOT upper_inc(VALUE));

CREATE TABLE test_domain_period(id serial, period domain_period);

vacuum analyze test_domain_period;

Get error:
ERROR: type 920283 is not a range type

I am not able to reproduce this failure in 9.3.4. I suggest you upgrade.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs