November 2013 Replication Data Loss Issue
Hello,
we have a database master Version:
PostgreSQL 9.1.6 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (Debian 4.7.2-2) 4.7.2, 64-bit
and a WAL-Replication Slave with hot-standby version:
PostgreSQL 9.1.9 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (Debian 4.7.2-5) 4.7.2, 64-bit.
Since a few days we had problems with the Linux OOM-Killer.
Some simple query that normally take around 6-7 minutes now takes 5 hours.
We did not change any configuration values the last days.
Are we affected by this bug:
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Nov2013ReplicationIssue ?
Regards,
Basti
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
On 03/17/2014 10:57 AM, basti wrote:
we have a database master Version:
PostgreSQL 9.1.6 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (Debian 4.7.2-2) 4.7.2, 64-bit
and a WAL-Replication Slave with hot-standby version:
PostgreSQL 9.1.9 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (Debian 4.7.2-5) 4.7.2, 64-bit.Since a few days we had problems with the Linux OOM-Killer.
Some simple query that normally take around 6-7 minutes now takes 5 hours.
We did not change any configuration values the last days.Are we affected by this bug:
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Nov2013ReplicationIssue ?
No. Per the wiki page:
Who is at risk for this issue?
Users who:
are on one of the following PostgreSQL versions: 9.3.0, 9.3.1, 9.2.5, 9.1.10, and 9.0.14. Earlier versions are not affected.
- Heikki
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs