BUG #13445: 8.15.1 is missleading regarding array dimensionality

Started by Brent Douglasalmost 11 years ago2 messagesbugs
Jump to latest
#1Brent Douglas
brent.n.douglas@gmail.com

The following bug has been logged on the website:

Bug reference: 13445
Logged by: Brent Douglas
Email address: brent.n.douglas@gmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 9.4.4
Operating system: docs only
Description:

Section 8.15.1 is slightly missleading regarding array dimensionality as the
first example and following comment both read like array declarations in
many programming languages where [] is a single dimensional array and [][]
is a two dimensional array while having different semantics.

To make it more obvious that arrays do not have dimensions the section
stating this could be moved before the example table sal_emp.

The words "one-dimensional" and "two-dimensional" in the comment on the
sal_emp example table could also be removed.

--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

#2Bruce Momjian
bruce@momjian.us
In reply to: Brent Douglas (#1)
Re: BUG #13445: 8.15.1 is missleading regarding array dimensionality

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 04:16:09PM +0000, brent.n.douglas@gmail.com wrote:

The following bug has been logged on the website:

Bug reference: 13445
Logged by: Brent Douglas
Email address: brent.n.douglas@gmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 9.4.4
Operating system: docs only
Description:

Section 8.15.1 is slightly missleading regarding array dimensionality as the
first example and following comment both read like array declarations in
many programming languages where [] is a single dimensional array and [][]
is a two dimensional array while having different semantics.

To make it more obvious that arrays do not have dimensions the section
stating this could be moved before the example table sal_emp.

The words "one-dimensional" and "two-dimensional" in the comment on the
sal_emp example table could also be removed.

Well, it's a little odd because while dimensionality is not enforced
when defining columns, it does have an effect when accessing values. I
am not sure that mentioning things in the opposite order would help as
we have to define dimensionality for us later.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs